Abstract 1352: Shp2 is required for CML initiation and maintenance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) caused by the constitutively activated BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase. CML progresses from an initial chronic phase, through an accelerated phase, to a final and fatal blast crisis. Current first-line therapy for CML involves tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinibs. However, TKIs don't completely cure CML, as revealed by low complete molecular response rate and frequent disease relapse upon drug withdrawal. Studies of patient samples and mouse models indicate that this most likely results from lack of dependence of CML stem cells (CML-SCs) on BCR-ABL for survival. It is important to further identify potential targets of CML-SC. Shp2 is a non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase involed in RTK, cytokine, and integrine signaling pathways, and is a target of Abl kinase during cell proliferation. It is required for survival and maintenance of normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). In the context of CML, BCR-ABL constitutively phosphorylates Gab2, which then binds to Shp2, resulting in its inappropriate activation of downstream pathways, including the Ras-Erk cascade. Gab2 is required for CML initiation in vivo. We hypothesized that Shp2 is required for CML development from the stem cell level and might be an effective target for treatment of CML. Using our induced Shp2 deletion tools, we found that Shp2 is required for CML initiation and maintenance in a bone marrow transplant model of CML. Moreover, primitive CML cells undergo elevated cell death upon Shp2 knockout. This implicates Shp2 as a potential target for CML therapy in future. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1352. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1352
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".