New Cyclopentenyl-Linked [NPN] Ligands and Their Coordination Chemistry with Zirconium: Synthesis of a Dinuclear Side-On-Bound Dinitrogen Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis and characterization of two 1,2-cyclopentyl-bridged diiminophosphine proligands, (CY5)[NPN](DMP)H(2) (CY5 = cyclopentylidene; DMP = 2,6-Me(2)C(6)H(3)) and (CY5)[NPN](DIPP)H(2) (DIPP = 2,6-(i)Pr(2)C(6)H(3)), are presented, and tautomerization to the corresponding 1,2-cyclopentenyl-bridged enamineimine phosphine precursors is reported. These two new proligands are obtained by deprotonation of N-DMP- or N-DIPP-cyclopentylideneimine (N-DMP, 2,6-dimethylphenyl; N-DIPP, 2,6-diisopropylphenyl) and the subsequent addition of 0.5 equiv of dichlorophenylphosphine. Each ligand precursor exists as a mixture of isomers that consist of the diimine, enamineimine, and dienamine tautomers and corresponding stereoisomers, each of which could be identified. The bis(dimethylamido)zirconium complexes (CY5)[NPN](DMP)Zr(NMe(2))(2) and (CY5)[NPN](DIPP)Zr(NMe(2))(2) were prepared directly from the neutral proligands and Zr(NMe(2))(4) via protonolysis. Exchange of the dimethylamido ligands in the latter complexes for chlorides and iodides takes place upon reaction with excess Me(3)SiCl and Me(3)SiI, respectively. A dinuclear zirconium-dinitrogen complex, {(CY5)[NPN](DMP)Zr(THF)}(2)(μ-η(2):η(2)-N(2)), was obtained via KC(8) reduction of (CY5)[NPN](DMP)ZrCl(2) under 4 atm of N(2). On the basis of single-crystal X-ray analysis, N(2) has been reduced to a side-on-bound hydrazido (μ-η(2):η(2)-N(2)(4-)) unit. This dinitrogen complex is thermally unstable and decomposes in solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".