<i>C</i><sup>8</sup>-Heteroaryl-2′-deoxyguanosine Adducts as Conformational Fluorescent Probes in the <i>Nar</i>I Recognition Sequence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The optical, redox, and electronic properties of C(8)-heteroaryl-2'-deoxyguanosine (dG) adducts with C(8)-substituents consisting of furyl ((Fur)dG), pyrrolyl ((Pyr)dG), thienyl ((Th)dG), benzofuryl ((Bfur)dG), indolyl ((Ind)dG), and benzothienyl ((Bth)dG) are described. These adducts behave as fluorescent nucleobase probes with emission maxima from 379 to 419 nm and fluorescence quantum yields (Φ(fl)) in the 0.1-0.8 range in water at neutral pH. The probes exhibit quenched fluorescence with increased solvent viscosity and decreased solvent polarity. The (Fur)dG, (Bfur)dG, (Ind)dG, and (Bth)dG derivatives were incorporated into the G(3) position of the 12-mer oligonucleotide 5'-CTCG(1)G(2)CG(3)CCATC-3' that contains the recognition sequence of the NarI Type II restriction endonuclease. This sequence is widely used to study the biological activity (mutagenicity) of C(8)-arylamine-dG adducts with adduct conformation (anti vs syn) playing a critical role in the biological outcome. The modified NarI(X = (Fur)G, (Ind)G, (Bfur)G, or (Bth)G) oligonucleotides were hybridized to the complementary strand containing either C (NarI'(C)) or G (NarI'(G)) opposite the probe. The duplex structures were characterized by UV melting temperature analysis, fluorescence spectroscopy, collisional fluorescence quenching studies, and circular dichroism (CD). The emission of the probes showed sensitivity to the opposing base in the duplex, and suggested the utility of fluorescence spectroscopy to monitor probe conformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".