Surface Diastereomeric Complexes Formed by Methyl Benzoylformate and (<i>R</i>)-1-(1-Naphthyl)ethylamine on Pt(111)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formation of diastereomeric complexes between methyl benzoylformate (MBF) and ( R )-1-(1-naphthyl)ethylamine, ( R )-NEA, on Pt(111) was studied using scanning tunneling microscopy. We observe several distinct geometries formed by 1:1 and 2:1 MBF/( R )-NEA complexes. The complexation patterns are compared with our previous data for 2,2,2-trifluoroacetophenone, (TFAP)/( R )-NEA, and methyl-3,3,3 trifluoropyruvate, (MTFP)/( R )-NEA, complexes on Pt(111). Steric hindrance due to the phenyl group forces MBF to form complexes that are inverted relative to those formed by MTFP. Compared to TFAP, the addition of the ester group, permitting intermolecular bonding through either the ester or the keto-carbonyl or both, increases the number of complexation geometries that the substrate can adopt. In particular, the ketoester group permits the phenyl group to be placed distant from ( R )-NEA at several positions while also permitting NH···OC bonding. Overall, this leads to a decrease of the prochiral selectivity relative to TFAP/( R )-NEA complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".