MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

P1-01-09: A Focused Immune Response Targeting the Homotypic Binding Domain of the Carcinoembryonic Antigen Blocks the Establishment of Tumor Foci In Vivo.

2011· article· en· W2334376408 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Gariépy, Aws Abdul‐Wahid

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarcinoembryonic antigenMetastasisELISPOTCancer researchImmune systemAntigenCancerMedicineImmunologyT cellInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is over-expressed in ∼56% of breast cancer biopsies but is absent on normal breast tissues. Clinically, high preoperative serum concentrations of CEA in breast cancer patients correlate with metastasis, treatment failure and poor overall prognosis. More importantly, the homotypic cell adhesion functions of CEA have been associated with cancer progression and tumor metastasis. One approach to prevent the establishment of CEA-dependent metastatic foci in breast cancer patients would thus be to interfere with the cell adhesion functions of this cell surface antigen. We hypothesize that vaccinating CEA-expressing transgenic (CEA. Tg) mice with a recombinant, altered-self form of the Ig V-like N domain of CEA, involved in homotypic interactions, should result in a focused immune response able to block the CEA-mediated adhesion of murine carcinoma cells expressing CEA (MC38.CEA) and the establishment of metastatic foci in this transgenic mouse model. Material and Methods: A recombinant form of the CEA N domain was expressed in E.coli, purified and shown in cell-based assays to bind to the A3 domain of human CEA and to block cell adhesion in CEA-expressing tumor cell lines. CEA-expressing transgenic mice were vaccinated i.p. with the recombinant CEA N domain protein and poly I:C. Resulting serum Ig [IgG1 and IgG2a] as well as cytokine expression levels [IFN-g, IL-4 and IL10 responses] were measured by ELISA and ELISPOT assays. The CEA-expressing MC38 murine tumor cells were implanted s.c. into CEA.Tg mice [hind leg; primary site model; tumor growth within 7 days] or administered i.v. to generate lung tumor metastases within 60 days or injected i.p. to generate peritoneal tumor nodules within 35 days in unvaccinated animals. Results: The recombinant folded, deglycosylated N domain of human CEA is perceived as an altered self-antigen by CEA.Tg mice when administered i.p. with poly I:C acting as an adjuvant. The vaccinated mice develop strong IgG1 and IgG2a responses able to kill CEA-expressing human breast cancer cell lines [MCF-7 and MDA-MB231] in vitro by both Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC) and Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) mechanisms. The sera of such animals also inhibited cell-cell aggregation mediated by CEA expression. Vaccination of CEA.tg mice following the establishment of CEA-expressing MC38 murine hind leg tumor mass resulted in a significant delay in tumor growth. More importantly, animals pre-vaccinated with the recombinant CEA N domain did not display lung or peritoneal tumor foci following the i.v. or i.p. injection of CEA-expressing murine tumor cells. Discussion: A simple vaccination protocol using a recombinant form of the N domain of CEA as an immunogen is sufficient to engender an immune response that can block the development of CEA-expressing tumor foci in the lungs and peritoneal cavity of CEA.tg mice and destroys human breast cancer cells expressing CEA. These results suggest that mounting a focused antibody response to the N domain of CEA may represent a simple therapeutic strategy to control the establishment of metastatic foci in breast cancer patients expression high levels of the antigen CEA. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-01-09.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→