MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2337035621 · doi:10.5539/mas.v10n3p142

Impact of Knowledge Management on Success of Customer Relationship Management (Staff, Leadership, Organizational Structure)

2016· article· en· W2337035621 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zinat Ghaedi, Abdolali Keshtegar, Mohammad Reza Ghasemi

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganizational commitmentCustomer relationship managementBusinessStructural equation modelingKnowledge managementOrganizational performanceBusiness administrationPsychologyMarketingMathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of knowledge management on success of customer relationship management: mediating impacts of organizational factors (staffs, leadership, organizational structure) in capital bank by descriptive-correlation method. Accordingly, to measure knowledge management, the Fang and Choai (2009) questionnaire was applied, to evaluate organizational variables (staffs, leadership, organizational structure), Greve & Albers (2006) questionnaire was used and to assess technology of customer relationship management, Chang et al (2006) questionnaire was employed and regarding success of customer relationship management, Bang (2005) and Chen and Chung (2004) questionnaires were used. The population of this study included all staffs of capital bank in Tehran city that were 642 staffs which based on Cochran formula, 240 staffs were selected by cluster sampling. To analyze data, Pearson correlation test and structural equation model were employed by using SPSS and AMOS software. The obtained results of this study indicated that the knowledge management affected significantly on organizational factors (staffs, leadership, organizational structure). Furthermore, the technology of interaction management affected significantly on success of customer relationship management and also technology of customer relationship management influenced significantly on organizational factors (staffs, leadership, organizational structure). Organizational factors (staffs, leadership, organizational structure) affected significantly on success of customer relationship management. The findings of this study showed that the knowledge management did not affect significantly on success of customer relationship management. Technology of customer relationship management by mediating variable of organizational factors did not affect significantly on success of customer relationship management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyFrench-language works237,207