MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2339045121

Autonomía de la matrona: un repaso a su situación en el mundo

2015· article· es· W2339045121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Casteleiro-Vallina, Eva Díez-Paz

Bibliographic record

VenueNuberos Científica · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and bioethics in healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceAutonomyHumanitiesPhilosophyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La de matrona es una profesion globalizada con un campo de actuacion bien detenido, lo cual hace interesante analizar como las desigualdades existentes en el mundo pueden influir en la autonomia de la matrona en el desarrollo de la profesion. El objetivo es describir los diferentes grados de autonomia con que la matrona desarrolla su trabajo en diferentes partes del mundo. Se trata de una revision bibliografica en diferentes bases de datos y a traves de entrevistas con los representantes de las asociaciones de matronas pertenecientes d a Confederacion Internacional de Matronas. En los resultados se describe la profesion de matrona y la autonomia en el desarrollo del su trabajo, en los distintos paises incluidos en el estudio que son: Espana, Afganistan, Banglades, India, Bolivia, Chile, Malawi, Kenia, Marruecos, Finlandia, Alemania, Inglaterra, Francia, Australia, Canada y Estados Unidos de America. Como conclusion se destaca que las competencias de las matronas son constantes alrededor del mundo, pero su autonomia no lo es, esta depende enormemente de las politicas existentes en cada pais y de la formacion a la que tienen acceso. Palabras clave: - Autonomia profesional - Matrona - Organizacion internacional Midwife and her work on global level has a well-defined field of action. This is what makes it interesting in order to analyze how the inequalities, present in the world, can influence on autonomous midwifery practice. Objective: To describe dierent degrees of the mid- wife’s autonomy in making-decisions in dierent places around the world. Methodology: This research is based on a literature review within dierent databases and a series of interviews with representatives from Midwives Associations who are members of the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM). Results: They showed a description of the Midwifery profession as well as the level of midwifery autonomy in organizing their work performed in the countries included in the study: Spain, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Bolivia, Chile, Malawi, Kenya, Morocco, Finland, Germany, England, France, Australia, Canada and The United States of America. Conclusions: It is pointed out the essential Competencies for Basic Midwifery Practice are the same around the world however, their autonomy depends greatly on the existing policies of each country and the training of midwives have access. Keywords: - Professional Autonomy - Midwives - International Organitation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuberos CientíficaSame topicEthics and bioethics in healthcareFrench-language works237,207