MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Utilizing metformin to enhance the efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

2011· article· en· W2341568259 on OpenAlexaff
Laurence Klotz, Natalie A. Venier, Avi Vandersluis, Rickvinder Besla, Neil Fleshner, Michaël Pollak, V. Venkateswaran, Alexandra Colquhoun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity Health NetworkSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDU145BicalutamideMetforminHyperinsulinemiaLNCaPProstate cancerMedicineEndocrinologyInternal medicineCancer researchIn vivoCancerCell growthPharmacologyInsulinAndrogen receptorInsulin resistanceBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

22 Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) incidence varies by geographic location, with developed countries exhibiting higher levels of disease. Some attribute this to the “Westernized lifestyle” of high energy diets and limited physical activity with consequent obesity. Obesity and related diseases like diabetes, cause hyperinsulinemia, which upregulates pro-survival insulin/insulin-like growth factor signalling. Previous work shows diet-induced hyperinsulinemia enhances PCa tumor growth in vivo. Metformin, a diabetic treatment, reduces hyperinsulinemia, and also exhibits anti-neoplastic properties. We assessed the potential benefit of combining a standard PCa treatment (bicalutamide) with metformin in vitro and in vivo. Methods: The effect of bicalutamide and/or metformin on colony formation rates was assessed in LNCaP, PC3, DU145 and PC3AR2 PCa cell lines using clonogenic assay. Western blot and cell cycle analyses were used to elucidate mechanisms of interaction between the drugs. The combination treatment regimen was assessed in vivo using a murine xenograft model. Results: Micromolar bicalutamide or millimolar metformin caused significant dose-dependent reduction in colony formation rates (p<0.001). Combination treatment further significantly reduced colony formation rates (p<0.005). Differing mechanisms of interaction occurred in AR positive and negative cell lines. Following combination treatment LNCaP cells exhibited altered cell proliferation (decreased PCNA) and perturbed cell cycle kinetics (G1/S arrest). PC3 cells showed evidence of enhanced apoptosis (increased BAX, decreased caspase 3, phospho-Akt). Preliminary in vivo results show significantly diminished tumor growth following combination treatment (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Combining bicalutamide and metformin significantly reduces PCa cell colony formation rates further than either monotherapy. In AR positive cells this effect is mediated by reducing cell proliferation rates, whereas in AR negative cells combination treatment promotes apoptosis. This combination drug regimen may potentially improve prostate-cancer specific survival via the direct anti-neoplastic properties outlined. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer→French-language works237,207→