MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2373536588

A new generation industrial machine for the plasma immersion ionimplantation and enhanced deposition

2002· article· en· W2373536588 on OpenAlexaff
Tong Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueVacuum · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal and Thin Film Mechanics
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmaPlasma-immersion ion implantationVacuum chamberVacuum arcMaterials scienceDeposition (geology)Pulse durationPulse (music)VoltageElectric arcIonAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsChemistryOpticsComposite materialElectrodeLaserElectrical engineeringPhysicsIon implantation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new generation industrial machine for the plasma immersion ion implantation and enhanced deposition has been recently developed by Southwestern Institute of Physics. The vacuum chamber, 900 mm in diameter and 1050 mm in height, is constructed of stainless steel and stands vertically on a base support. Two 1400 L/m turbomolecular pumps and a 30 L/min mechanical pump can be controlled by PLC and bring the chamber to a base pressure of 4×10 4 Pa. Gaseous and metallic plasma can be independently produced by hot filaments discharge and three high efficiency filter vacuum arc plasma sources. There are water cooling target chuck and back flanges on the top of the vacuum chamber. The power modulator operates in both the pulse bunching and single pulse modes. The pulse voltage output is 10~80 kV, repetition frequency is 50~500 Hz,and the rise time of the pulse is less than 2 μs. In general, plasma density is 10 8~10 10 cm 3 , and film deposition rate is 0.1~0.5 nm/s. Some experimental results are also reported in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVacuumSame topicMetal and Thin Film MechanicsFrench-language works237,207