Study on properties of boneprotein hydrolyzate and konjac and their applications as antifreeze in frozen carp surimi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Konjac gel experiments and antioxidant properties of bone protein hydrolyzate experiment to determine the optimum use amount of high antioxidant activity of the bone protein hydrolyzate and the high gel konjac were 4% and 0.5%,respectively. As the same time,compounding boneprotein hydrolysates and konjac as cryoprotectant was compared with commercial cryoprotecta nts. The water holding capacity(WHC)(cooking loss, thawing loss), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances( TBARS) of carp surimi and the gel properties(hardness,spring,WHC,whiteness) of surimi protein were measured to study protective effect on frozen surimi(-18℃,180d) with the compounding group. Results indicated that the cooking loss,thawing loss,TBARS and carbonyl content of compounding group decreased by 62.71%,50.25%,71.83%,36.51% at the end of the storage compared to the control groups. While the hardness,spring,WHC and whiteness of protein gel increased by 52.80%,42.19%,10.67%,12.88%,and the indicators increased 15.79%,6.45%,36.17%,10.00%,14.78%,14.55%,3.55%,4.84% compared to the commercial cryoprotectants group(p0.05),respectively. The results demonstrated that compounding boneprotein hydrolysates and konjac could inhibit fat oxidation,prevent protein denaturation by frozen sorage,and improve WHC,gel strength of surimi significantly. The best formula of the frozen surimi cryoprotectants was 4% bone protein hydrolyzate,0.5% konjac.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it