MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2394766804 · doi:10.1158/1557-3265.ovca15-a33

Abstract A33: Dual loss of the SWI/SNF complex ATPases SMARCA4/BRG1 and SMARCA2/BRM is highly sensitive and specific for small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type.

2016· article· en· W2394766804 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony N. Karnezis, Yemin Wang, Pilar Ramos, William P.D. Hendricks, Holly Yin, Esther Oliva, Emanuela D′Angelo, Jaime Prat, Marisa R. Nucci, Torsten O. Nielsen, Bernard E. Weissman, Jeffrey M. Trent, C. Blake Gilks, David G. Huntsman

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSMARCA4Trichostatin ACancer researchBiologyChromatin remodelingHistone deacetylaseChromatinHistoneGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is a lethal and sometimes familial ovarian tumor of young women and children. We and others recently discovered that over 90% of SCCOHT harbor inactivating mutations in the chromatin remodeling gene SMARCA4 with concomitant loss of its encoded protein SMARCA4 (BRG1), one of two mutually-exclusive ATPases of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. To determine the specificity of SMARCA4 loss for SCCOHT, we examined the expression of SMARCA4 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in more than 3000 primary gynecologic tumors. Among ovarian tumors, it was only absent in clear cell carcinoma (15 of 360, 4%). In the uterus, it was absent in endometrial stromal sarcomas (4 of 52, 8%) and high-grade endometrioid carcinomas (2 of 338, 1%). Recent studies have shown that SMARCA2 (BRM), the other mutually exclusive ATPase of the SWI/SNF complex, is necessary for survival of tumor cells lacking SMARCA4. Therefore, we examined SMARCA2 expression and discovered that all SMARCA4-negative SCCOHTs also lacked SMARCA2 protein by IHC, including the SCCOHT cell lines BIN67 and SCCOHT1. Among ovarian tumors, the SMARCA4/SMARCA2 dual loss phenotype appears completely specific for SCCOHT. SMARCA2 loss was not due to mutation but rather from an absence of mRNA expression, which was restored by treatment with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin A. Treatment with HDAC inhibitors or re-expression of either SMARCA4 or SMARCA2 potently inhibited the growth of BIN67 and SCCOHT1 cell lines. Our results indicate that SMARCA4 loss, either alone or with SMARCA2 loss, is the first highly sensitive and specific diagnostic immunohistochemical marker of SCCOHT, and that HDAC inhibitors are promising agents to explore for the treatment of SCCOHT. Citation Format: Anthony N. Karnezis, Yemin Wang, Pilar Ramos, William Hendricks, Holly Yin, Esther Oliva, Emanuela D'Angelo, Jaime Prat, Marisa R. Nucci, Torsten O. Nielsen, Bernard E. Weissman, Jeffrey M. Trent, C Blake Gilks, David G. Huntsman. Dual loss of the SWI/SNF complex ATPases SMARCA4/BRG1 and SMARCA2/BRM is highly sensitive and specific for small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities; Oct 17-20, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A33.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207