MétaCan
← all works

Key insights for the future of urban ecosystem services research

2016· article· en· 331 citations· W2403896338 on OpenAlex· 10.5751/es-08445-210229

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian venueIt was published in a Canadian venue.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Classifier prediction

metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90

Predictions imitate two machine teachers. Scores are not calibrated prevalence probabilities.

Classifier candidate
ObservationalQualitativeTheoretical or conceptual
Classifier consensus
ObservationalQualitative
Teacher imitation scores

Codex

Observational0.092
Qualitative0.056
Theoretical or conceptual0.037
Not applicable0.012
Other design0.011
Metaresearch0.004
Simulation or modelling0.004
Science and technology studies0.002
Systematic review0.001
Bench or experimental0.000
Bibliometrics0.000
Open science0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Research integrity0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Case report0.000

Gemma

Observational0.336
Science and technology studies0.054
Qualitative0.030
Not applicable0.019
Simulation or modelling0.007
Theoretical or conceptual0.005
Scholarly communication0.001
Open science0.001
Systematic review0.001
Bibliometrics0.000
Bench or experimental0.000
Research integrity0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Case report0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Metaresearch0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread
0.234 how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Kremer, P., Z. Hamstead, D. Haase, T. McPhearson, N. Frantzeskaki, E. Andersson, N. Kabisch, N. Larondelle, E. Lorance Rall, A. Voigt, F. Baró, C. Bertram, E. Gómez-Baggethun, R. Hansen, A. Kaczorowska, J.-H. Kain, J. Kronenberg, J. Langemeyer, S. Pauleit, K. Rehdanz, M. Schewenius, C. van Ham, D. Wurster, and T. Elmqvist. 2016. Key insights for the future of urban ecosystem services research. Ecology and Society 21(2):29.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08445-210229

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.