MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2404179284

MARSH BIRDS OF THE CONNECTICUT RIVER ESTUARY: A 20-YEAR PERSPECTIVE

2004· article· en· W2404179284 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert J. Craig

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarshHabitatEcologyGeographyEstuaryWetlandCoveSalt marshSparrowFisheryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study reports the summer distribution of marsh birds of the lower Connecticut River for the 1994 breeding season. It compares findings with similar observations made between 1974 and 1987, and serves as a 20- year update on the first 1974 surveys. In addition, habitat change over the 20-year interval is qualitatively assessed, and preliminary date are presented that examine the use of cattail and invasive reed habitats by selected marsh bird species. In 1994, I found 21 marsh-breeding species and 24 marsh-using species at the Connecticut River marshes. During the study period, populations of species like the American Black Duck, Sharp-tailed Sparrow, Red-winged Blackbird, Herring Gull, and Bank Swallow declined, whereas species like the Mute Swan, Canada Goose, Willet, Great Blue Heron, and Osprey increased. Moreover, species like Blue-winged Teal, Common Moorhen, and Black- crowned Night Heron that were summer residents in 1974 were absent in 1994. Most notable among habitat changes that have occurred in the Connecticut River marshes were contraction of salt meadow patches at transitional marshes, progressive replacement of cattails by reeds at Great Island, Upper Island, Ragged Rock Creek, Ayer's Point, and Lord's Cove, dying back of Iva frutescens at Great Island and Black Hall River, a small increase in cattail cover at Wetherfi eld Meadows, expansion of cover by Lythrum salicaria, and late growth by vegetation at freshwater marshes during years of heavy June flooding. Data on use of cattail and invasive reed habitats suggested that certain species like the Least Bittern, Marsh Wren and Red-winged Blackbird used reeds extensively, but particularly the Virginia Rail most frequently occupied cattail habitats. This study reports the summer distribution of marsh birds of the lower Connecticut River for the 1994 breeding season. It compares findings with similar observations made between 1974 and 1987, and serves as a 20-year update on the first surveys. It examines also changes in habitats that have occurred during this period, and provides preliminary data on use by marsh birds of cattail habitats versus invasive reed communities. The data reported here provide a rare look at long-term changes in bird populations and distributions. Examining community changes such as these provide insights into the dynamics of the system. Previous investigators of the Connecticut River avifauna include Clark (1884, 1897), who described the nest of the Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis), and Poulson (1969), who studied the physiology of the Seaside (Ammodramus maritima) and Sharp-tailed (A. caudac uta) sparrows. Ames and Mersereau (1964), Ames (1966), Wiemeyer et al. (1975), Spitzer (1977), Spitzer et al. (1978), and Spitzer and Poole (1980) studied nesting Ospreys (Pandion haliaetus), and Peterson (1969) briefly discussed population changes of raptorial and fish-eating birds of the river. More recently, Craig (1990) described the historic distributions of marsh birds in this system. The most complete analysis of avian community ecology in the Connecticut River system is that by Craig and Beal (1992). In this study, species richness of marsh breeders was found to be most closely associated with marsh size, although richness of marsh-using species (species that feed in marshes but nest elsewhere) was most closely associated with proximity to additio nal marsh habitat. In comparing species richness of series of small vs. a single large marsh, small marshes were found to hold similar numbers of species to the large site, but the large marsh accumulated rarer species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→