MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2410248495 · doi:10.1387/ijdb.11460999

Formation of retinal pigment epithelium in vitro by transdifferentiation of neural retina cells

2001· article· en· W2410248495 on OpenAlexafffund
Michał Opas, Janet R. Davies, You Zhou, Ewa Dziak

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Developmental Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsTransdifferentiationBiologyCell biologyRetinaRetinal pigment epitheliumNeural cell adhesion moleculeRetinalEmbryonic stem cellMuller gliaEpitheliumCell typeCell adhesionCellStem cellGeneticsNeuroscienceProgenitor cellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chick embryonic neural retina (NR) dedifferentiates in culture and can transdifferentiate spontaneously into retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Both, primary RPE and transdifferentiated RPE (RPEt), are characterized by pigmentation, expression of RPE-specific protein, eRPEAG and lack of expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule, NCAM. In contrast, NR cells are unpigmented and express NCAM but not eRPE(AG). Functionally, both primary RPE and the RPEt cells display a pH(i) response to bFGF, which is different from that of the NR. We used these characteristics to distinguish cell types in primary cultures of chick NR and follow the changes in phenotype that occur during transdifferentiation. We show that the RPEt forms as small "islands" in the packed regions of the primary, "mother" NR cell sheets, in a stochastic process. Because of a small number of cells involved in the initiation of the transdifferentiation we refer to it as a "leader effect" to contrast it with the "community effect" which requires many competent cells to be present in a group to be able to respond to an inductive signal. The RPEt then expands centrifugally and underneath the surrounding NR sheet. To determine if the RPEt maintains its identity in isolation while displaying the RPE-typical phenotypic plasticity, we explanted the islands of RPEt and treated half of them with bFGF. The untreated RPEt maintained its closely packed, polygonal pigmented phenotype but the bFGF-treated RPEt transdifferentiated into a non-pigmented, NR-like phenotype, indicating that RPEt encompasses the full differentiation repertoire of native RPE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of Developmental BiologySame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207