MétaCan
← all works

Recommendations for a Standard Research Assessment of Insomnia

2006· review· en· 1,213 citations· W2434919075 on OpenAlex· 10.1093/sleep/29.9.1155

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Canadian funderA Canadian agency funded it. The work may carry no Canadian affiliation at all.

Classifier prediction

metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90

Predictions imitate two machine teachers. Scores are not calibrated prevalence probabilities.

Classifier candidate
Systematic reviewNot applicable
Classifier consensus
Systematic reviewNot applicable
Teacher imitation scores

Codex

Not applicable0.740
Other design0.245
Systematic review0.130
Theoretical or conceptual0.003
Metaresearch0.002
Research integrity0.001
Simulation or modelling0.001
Bibliometrics0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Observational0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Open science0.000
Qualitative0.000
Case report0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Bench or experimental0.000

Gemma

Not applicable0.996
Systematic review0.257
Theoretical or conceptual0.005
Meta-analysis0.001
Randomized trial0.001
Metaresearch0.001
Bibliometrics0.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Research integrity0.000
Simulation or modelling0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Open science0.000
Case report0.000
Qualitative0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Scholarly communication0.000
Observational0.000
Bench or experimental0.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.536
Teacher spread
0.339 how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Study objectives: To present expert consensus recommendations for a standard set of research assessments in insomnia, reporting standards for these assessments, and recommendations for future research.

Participants

N/A.

Interventions

N/A.

Methods and results

An expert panel of 25 researchers reviewed the available literature on insomnia research assessments. Preliminary recommendations were reviewed and discussed at a meeting on March 10-11, 2005. These recommendations were further refined during writing of the current paper. The resulting key…

Retrieved from the Europe PMC core record. Structured section labels are preserved when supplied.