MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2441860542 · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b01105

Confronting Neutrality: Maximizing Success in the Analysis of Transition-Metal Catalysts by MALDI Mass Spectrometry

2016· article· en· W2441860542 on OpenAlexafffund
Gwendolyn A. Bailey, Deryn E. Fogg

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Catalysis · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrometryAnalyteAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Electrospray ionizationPhysical chemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The elucidation of molecular identity is a central challenge in homogeneous transition-metal catalysis. Most exacting, despite advances in electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), are neutral complexes, which encompass the vast majority of metal catalysts. Insight into molecular constitution, readily achieved in other areas of the chemical sciences, is commonly thwarted by fragmentation of inorganic and organometallic compounds, particularly for highly reactive species. MALDI-MS, where coupled with charge-transfer ionization, stands out from all other current MS methods in its unique capacity to report on the molecular identity of intact metal complexes irrespective of their initial charge state. Identified in the present work are methods that enable routine, unambiguous identification of such complexes across a wide range of standard MALDI mass spectrometers. The origin of fragmentation during MALDI-MS analysis is explored on 13 different instruments at 9 facilities and across a range of mass analyzers, from TOF, TOF-TOF, and Q-TOF to Orbitrap. Selected as test analytes were the second-generation Hoveyda and Grubbs metathesis catalysts and the Grubbs resting-state methylidene complex, which span a very broad range in terms of ligand lability, and hence susceptibility to fragmentation. Three critical parameters emerge: (1) using the minimum applied laser energy necessary for sample volatilization; (2) minimizing the absorption cross-section of the analyte at the laser wavelength: (a) by appropriate laser choice, where options exist, (b) by using a matrix that absorbs as strongly as possible at the laser wavelength, in significant excess relative to the analyte (e.g., 500-fold), and (c) by prompt analysis, to limit matrix sublimation in the ion source; (3) using a charge-transfer matrix devoid of reactive protic or donor sites. A final, forward-looking section highlights relevant advances in state-of-the-art instrumentation, and instrumental features that would contribute to the optimization of next-generation MALDI mass spectrometers for this emerging application. These include fast-firing, contoured-profile, and, potentially, wavelength-tunable lasers, high-resolution mass analyzers, automatic plate rastering with software to support retroactive compilation of spectra from optimal sampling locations, and soft-vacuum or atmospheric-pressure sources, in conjunction with a standardized anaerobic interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS CatalysisSame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207