Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the thermodynamic stability of surface nanobubbles. The appropriate free energy is defined for the system of nanobubbles on a solid surface submerged in a supersaturated liquid solution at constant pressure and temperature, under conditions where an individual nanobubble is not in diffusive contact with a gas phase outside of the system or with other nanobubbles on the time scale of the experiment. The conditions under which plots of free energy versus the radius of curvature of the nanobubbles show a global minimum, which denotes the stable equilibrium state, are explored. Our investigation shows that supersaturation and an anomalously high contact angle (measured through the liquid) are required to have stable surface nanobubbles. In addition, the anomalously high contact angle of surface nanobubbles is discussed from the standpoint of a framework recently proposed by Koch, Amirfazli, and Elliott that relates advancing and receding contact angles to thermodynamic equilibrium contact angles, combined with the existence of a gas enrichment layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".