Quality Control Practice for Scholars Portal, an XML-based E-journals Repository
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ontario Scholars Portal (SP) is an XML based digital repository containing over 31,000,000 articles from more than 13,000 full text journals of 24 publishers which covers every academic discipline. Starting in 2006, SP began adopting NLM Journal Archiving and Interchange Tag Set v2.3 for its XML based E-journals system using MarkLogic. The publishers' native data is transformed to NLM Tag Set in SP in order to normalize data elements to a single standard for archiving, display and searching. Scholars Portal has established extremely high standards for ensuring that the content loaded into Scholars Portal is accurate and complete. Through the entire workflow from data ingest , data conversion and data display, quality control procedures have been implemented to ensure the integrity of the digital repository.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.192 | 0.266 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.018 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.024 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".