MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2482156283 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-4666

Abstract 4666: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mTOR inhibitors demonstrate broad efficacy and synergy in head and neck cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts

2016· article· en· W2482156283 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony C. Nichols, Laurie Ailkes, Ren Sun, Morgan Black, Alessandro Datti, Frederick S. Vizeacoumar, Nicole Pinto, Kara M. Ruicci, John Yoo, Kevin Fung, Danielle MacNeil, Joe S. Mymryk, Paul C. Boutros, John W. Barrett

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Science CentreUniversity of SaskatchewanLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEverolimusPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayCancer researchMedicineCancerKinasePharmacologyBiologyOncologyInternal medicineSignal transductionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: There is an urgent need for improved therapeutics in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) to improve survival and decrease treatment morbidity. The Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is frequently altered in HNSCC, particularly in human papillomavirus (HPV) positive disease. PI3K pathway inhibitors are under active investigation in preclinical models and clinical trials, however it is not clear which patient population will benefit most from these agents. Methods: Thirty unique HNSCC cell lines including five HPV positive lines were characterized with whole exome sequencing and copy number arrays. All lines were treated over a 10-point dose range with a PIK3CA specific inhibitor (BYL719), a pan PI3K inhibitor (GDC-0941), a combined pan-PI3k and mTOR inhibitor (BEZ-235), mTOR inhibitor (everolimus) and a combination of BYL719 and everolimus. Five unique patient derived xenografts (PDX) were treated with BYL719 and everolimus alone and in combination. Results: The selective PIK3CA inhibitor BYL719 was preferentially active in cell lines with PIK3CA activating mutations and amplifications (>100% relative PIK3CA amplification), however HRAS mutant lines were resistant. These genomic markers of sensitivity and resistance did not apply to the pan-PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 or combined PI3K-mTOR inhibitor BEZ-235, however these agents were more active in HPV-positive cell lines (P<0.05). BYL719 and everolimus were individually effective at decreasing tumor growth in four PDX models including a model with an activating PIK3CA mutation, two PIK3CA amplified models and a PIK3CA wild-type model. Combined PIK3CA and mTOR inhibition appeared to be synergistic and evolved resistance never developed to this treatment, however the combination caused significant weight loss in the PDX models. Interpretation: PI3K inhibitors were broadly active in HNSCC cell lines and PDXs and their application should not be solely restricted to tumors with activating PIK3CA mutations or amplifications. Agents with broader isoform activity and combined PI3K and mTOR treatment were more potent, however combined inhibitor treatment appeared toxic in the PDX models. This trade off of toxicity and efficacy needs to balanced in the clinical setting. Citation Format: Anthony C. Nichols, Laurie Ailkes, Ren Sun, Morgan Black, Alessandro Datti, Frederick Vizeacoumar, Nicole Pinto, Kara Ruicci, John Yoo, Kevin Fung, Danielle MacNeil, Joe Mymryk, Paul C. Boutros, John W. Barrett. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mTOR inhibitors demonstrate broad efficacy and synergy in head and neck cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenografts. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4666.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations→French-language works237,207→