MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2510684471 · doi:10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00537

Unsymmetrical Saturated Ketones Resulting from Activations of Hydrocarbon C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H and C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–H Bonds Effected by Cp*W(NO)(H)(η<sup>3</sup>-allyl) Complexes

2015· article· en· W2510684471 on OpenAlexafffund
Rhett A. Baillie, Guillaume Lefèvre, Russell J. Wakeham, Aaron S. Holmes, Peter Legzdins

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research GridDow Chemical Company
KeywordsChemistryLigand (biochemistry)MesityleneHydrideMedicinal chemistryBenzeneAdductKetoneAlkylGroup 2 organometallic chemistryAlkeneHydrocarbonDouble bondStereochemistryMetalMoleculeOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C–H activations of a C(sp 2 )–H bond in benzene or a C(sp 3 )–H bond in mesitylene at 80 °C under CO pressure in undried solvents without rigorous exclusion of air and moisture can be effected with the 18e complexes Cp*W(NO)(H)(η 3 -CH 2 CHCMe 2 ) ( 1 ), Cp*W(NO)(H)(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHMe) ( 2 ), and Cp*W(NO)(H)(η 3 -CH 2 CHCHPh) ( 3 ) (Cp* = η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ). These activations are regiospecific and afford in the case of complex 1 good yields of the unsymmetrical saturated ketones 4-methyl-1-phenylpentan-1-one ( 5 ) and 1-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methylhexan-2-one ( 8 ), respectively, in which the alkyl groups result from hydrogenation of the allyl ligand in the organometallic reactant. Complex 2 reacts similarly, but complex 3 only produces the ketone from its reaction with CO in benzene. Theoretical calculations indicate that the key mechanistic feature of these conversions is the formation of a 16e η 2 -alkene complex which is generated by the regiospecific migration of the hydride ligand onto the tertiary carbon of the allyl ligand. The 16e Cp*W(NO)(η 2 -CH 2 ═CHCHMe 2 ) and Cp*W(NO)(η 2 -MeCH═CHPh) intermediate complexes formed in this manner by complexes 1 and 3, respectively, have been trapped as the corresponding 18e CO adducts Cp*W(NO) (CO)(η 2 -CH 2 ═CHCHMe 2 ) ( 10 ) and Cp*W(NO) (CO)(η 2 -MeCH═CHPh) ( 11 ). All new complexes have been characterized by conventional spectroscopic and analytical methods, and the solid-state molecular structures of two isomers of 11 have been established by single-crystal X-ray crystallographic analyses. This new and facile method of synthesizing saturated unsymmetrical ketones via C–C bond formation not only is atom economical but also is part of a complete synthetic cycle, since Cp*W(NO)(CO) 2 ( 4 ) is the final organometallic product formed in all cases, and it can be readily reconverted to the hydrido allyl reactants 1 – 3 in three steps via Cp*W(NO)Cl 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207