MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515138490 · doi:10.1002/ijc.30288

Telomere structure and maintenance gene variants and risk of five cancer types

2016· review· en· W2515138490 on OpenAlexaff
Sara Karami, Younghun Han, Mala Pande, Iona Cheng, James Rudd, Brandon L. Pierce, Ellen L. Nutter, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Zsofia Kote‐Jarai, Sara Lindström, John S. Witte, Shenying Fang, Jiali Han, Peter Kraft, David J. Hunter, Fengju Song, James McKay, Stephen B. Gruber, Stephen J. Chanock, Angela Risch, Hongbing Shen, Christopher A. Haiman, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Graham Casey, Ulrike Peters, Ali Amin Al Olama, Andrew Berchuck, Sonja I. Berndt, Stéphane Bezieau, Paul Brennan, Hermann Brenner, Louise A. Brinton, Neil E. Caporaso, Andrew T. Chan, Jenny Chang‐Claude, David C. Christiani, Julie M. Cunningham, Douglas F. Easton, Rosalind A. Eeles, Timothy Eisen, Manish Gala, Steven Gallinger, Simon A. Gayther, Ellen L. Goode, Henrik Grönberg, Brian E. Henderson, Richard S. Houlston, Amit D. Joshi, Sébastien Küry, Mari T. Landi, Loı̈c Le Marchand, Kenneth Muir, Polly A. Newcomb, Jenny Permuth‐Wey, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Catherine Phelan, John D. Potter, Susan J. Ramus, Harvey A. Risch, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Martha L. Slattery, Honglin Song, Nicolas Wentzensen, Emily White, Fredrik Wiklund, Brent W. Zanke, Thomas A. Sellers, Wei Zheng, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Christopher I. Amos, Jennifer A. Doherty

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cancer · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoInstitute of Cancer Research
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthCancer Research UKNational Institute on AgingFrancis Crick InstituteNational Human Genome Research InstituteWorld Health Organization
KeywordsTelomereBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismProstate cancerProstateColorectal cancerBreast cancerOncologyTelomerase reverse transcriptaseCancerLung cancerInternal medicineCancer researchTelomeraseGeneGeneticsMedicineGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Telomeres cap chromosome ends, protecting them from degradation, double‐strand breaks, and end‐to‐end fusions. Telomeres are maintained by telomerase, a reverse transcriptase encoded by TERT , and an RNA template encoded by TERC . Loci in the TERT and adjoining CLPTM1L region are associated with risk of multiple cancers. We therefore investigated associations between variants in 22 telomere structure and maintenance gene regions and colorectal, breast, prostate, ovarian, and lung cancer risk. We performed subset‐based meta‐analyses of 204,993 directly‐measured and imputed SNPs among 61,851 cancer cases and 74,457 controls of European descent. Independent associations for SNP minor alleles were identified using sequential conditional analysis (with gene‐level p value cutoffs ≤3.08 × 10 −5 ). Of the thirteen independent SNPs observed to be associated with cancer risk, novel findings were observed for seven loci. Across the DCLRE1B region, rs974494 and rs12144215 were inversely associated with prostate and lung cancers, and colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers, respectively. Across the TERC region, rs75316749 was positively associated with colorectal, breast, ovarian, and lung cancers. Across the DCLRE1B region, rs974404 and rs12144215 were inversely associated with prostate and lung cancers, and colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers, respectively. Near POT1 , rs116895242 was inversely associated with colorectal, ovarian, and lung cancers, and RTEL1 rs34978822 was inversely associated with prostate and lung cancers. The complex association patterns in telomere‐related genes across cancer types may provide insight into mechanisms through which telomere dysfunction in different tissues influences cancer risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of CancerSame topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceFrench-language works237,207