MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518578490

STUDENTS OR PROFESSIONALS: IDENTITY CONFLICTS IN EXPERIENCE-BASED TEACHER EDUCATION

2001· article· en· W2518578490 on OpenAlex
Hugh Munby, Cinde Lock, Lara Nancy Smith

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Educational Sciences
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumPedagogyIdentity (music)Teacher educationPsychologySociologyPolitical scienceHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. Focus group and questionnaire data are used to explore the tensions experienced by teacher education candidates between the roles of teacher and of student. Data are from a series of evaluation studies of a one-year teacher education program that was restructured to provide an extended practicum beginning on the first day of the school year and ending in December. During this time, candidates were expected to act as teachers; also the program expectation was that the candidates would treat their teacher education year as their first year as professionals and not as their last year as students. The analysis reveals conflicts between these roles: e.g., assessment requirements within the practicum and within courses seemed contrary to the espousal of professionalism, and the emphasis on leaming from experience ran counter to candidates' early wishes to be told what to do. The paper concludes that those features of the professional and student roles that offer a productive counterpoint need to be identified for teacher education. ETUDIANTS OU PROFESSIONNELS: CONFLITS D'IDENTITE CHEZ LES ETUDIANTS INSCRITS A DES PROGRAMMES DE FORMATION DES MAITRES AXES SUR L'APPRENTISSAGE PAR L'EXPERIENCE RESUME. Les tensions que subissent les professeurs stagiaires partages entre leurs roles d'enseignant et d'etudiant ont ete analysees a l'aide de groupes de discussion et de questionnaires. Les donnees sont issues d'une serie d'etudes evaluatives sur un programme de formation des maitres d'une duree d'un an restructure de maniere a y integrer un stage prolonge. Du jour de la rentree des classes jusqu'au mois de decembre, les etudiants etaient censes remplir les fonctions d'un enseignant tout en considerant leur annee de formation comme leur premiere annee d'exercise plutot que leur derniere annee d'etudes. L'analyse met en evidence des conflits entre ces deux roles. Par exemple, les imperatifs d'evaluation du stage et des cours semblaient s'opposer a l'adoption d'une attitude professionnelle et l'importance accordee a l'apprentissage par l'experience contrariait l'aspiration initiale des etudiants a suivre des consignes. Les auteurs en deduisent qu'il faut caracteriser, pour les besoins de la formation des maitres, les roles professionnel et etudiant, de facon a trouver une complementairite productive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.361
GPT teacher head0.533
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it