Antimicrobial and Antitumor Screening of Fluorescent 5,7‐Dihydroxy‐4‐Propyl‐ <i>2H</i> ‐Chromen‐2‐One Derivatives with Docking Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A series of novel fluorescent 5,7‐dihydroxy‐4‐propyl‐2 H ‐chromen‐2‐one derivatives ( 2a–j ) were synthesized and were found to absorb around 322 and 410 nm.All compounds except the nitro‐containing compound exhibited emission wavelengths around 450 nm with good fluorescence quantum yields ( Φ F ). Their antimicrobial activity was investigated and tested against several human pathogen Gram‐positive, Gram‐negative bacteria and fungi as well as mycobacterium using agar well diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentrations were reported. All compounds showed significantly potent antimicrobial activities against most bacterial strains compared to reference drugs. Due to their structural similarity to reference drugs clorobiocin and novobiocin, the docking experiments in the ATP binding pocket of DNA gyrase B enzyme revealed that the compounds mostly have the same binding mode as the reference drugs. Moreover, the cytotoxic activity was also evaluated against four different human cell lines and exhibited more potency than the reference drug.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".