DNA Repair by DNA: The UV1C DNAzyme Catalyzes Photoreactivation of Cyclobutane Thymine Dimers in DNA More Effectively than Their de Novo Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UV1C, a 42-nt DNA oligonucleotide, is a deoxyribozyme (DNAzyme) that optimally uses 305 nm wavelength light to catalyze photoreactivation of a cyclobutane thymine dimer placed within a gapped, unnatural DNA substrate, TDP. Herein we show that UV1C is also capable of photoreactivating thymine dimers within an authentic single-stranded DNA substrate, LDP. This bona fide UV1C substrate enables, for the first time, investigation of whether UV1C catalyzes only photoreactivation or also the de novo formation of thymine dimers. Single-turnover experiments carried out with LDP and UV1C, relative to control experiments with LDP alone in single-stranded and double-stranded contexts, show that while UV1C does modestly promote thymine dimer formation, its major activity is indeed photoreactivation. Distinct photostationary states are reached for LDP in its three contexts: as a single strand, as a constituent of a double-helix, and as a 1:1 complex with UV1C. The above results on the cofactor-independent photoreactivation capabilities of a catalytic DNA reinforce a series of recent, unexpected reports that purely nucleotide-based photoreactivation is also operational within conventional double-helical DNA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".