MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B053: Characterizing the effects of the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-AZA-CdR during CD8 T cell expansion

2016· article· en· W2548323002 on OpenAlexaff
Helen Loo Yau

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunotherapyCancer immunotherapyCytotoxic T cellCancer researchImmune systemImmune checkpointDNA methylationImmunologyCD8CancerBiologyT cellMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Immune checkpoint blockade therapy has been the most recent advance for achieving durable clinical response of different advanced cancers. However, most patients still remain non-responsive to immunotherapy alone, which suggest the need for combining different cancer therapies. Dual blockade targeting CTLA-4 and PD1/PDL1 pathway have been explored in advance melanoma, renal cell cancer, and NSCLC with promising clinical evidence. Though it is still unclear which sequence of checkpoint blockade therapies is the most effective. Another combinatorial strategy for cancer treatment would be combing epigenetic therapy with immunotherapy. Low doses of the DNA methylation inhibitor (DNMTis), 5-AZA-CdR, on cancer cells has durable anti-tumorigenic effects by inducing cell cycle arrest and immune-modulatory effects that increases their visibility by the immune system. Growing evidence led by our group and others suggest that DNMTis can upregulate immune signalling in cancer cells through viral mimicry and upregulation of tumor associated antigens, highlighting clinical potential to combine with immunotherapy. While the effects of DNMTis have been mostly studied in cancer cells, their effects on the immune system remains vastly unknown specially at clinically relevant low doses. The goal was to study the effects of 5-AZA-CdR on CD8+ T cells due to their inherent cytotoxic functions to recognize and kill pathogen infected cells and tumor cells. Because DNA methylation is a known mechanism by which CD8+ T cells can regulate the transcription of genes encoding for effector cytokines such as IFN-gamma, we hypothesize that treatment of 5-AZA-CdR during CD8+ T cell expansion will allow more permissive transcription of effector cytokines genes, thus conferring enhanced CD8+ T cell effector function. We used human CD8+ T cells expanded with anti-CD3/CD28 beads in the presence or absence of lose dose 5-AZA-CdR. Our results indicate that while low dose 5-AZA-CdR treatment during human CD8+ T cell expansion reduced CD8+ T cell proliferation capacity and increased expression of various T cell inhibitory receptors, functional capacity of CD8+ was improved. Low dose 5-AZA-CdR treatment during human CD8+ T cell expansion conferred higher expression and production of the effector cytokines IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha, and the cytotoxic granules Granzyme B. These observations suggest that treatment with 5-AZA-CdR during CD8+ T cells expansion may enhance their cytotoxic functions. By studying the effects of 5-AZA-CdR on CD8+ T cells, our goal is to use this knowledge generated in here to help elucidate rational combinatorial regimens for epigenetic therapy and immunotherapy. Citation Format: Helen Loo Yau. Characterizing the effects of the DNA methylation inhibitor 5-AZA-CdR during CD8 T cell expansion [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Second CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; 2016 Sept 25-28; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B053.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207