MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Bortezomib Impairs Myeloma Cells (MM) Homologous Recombination Through Inhibition of the E2-Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme UBC13

2011· article· en· W2550148757 on OpenAlexaff
Paola Neri, Li Ren, Jordan Johnson, Kathy Gratton, Erin Stebner, Carolyn Owen, Peter Duggan, Douglas A. Stewart, Nizar J. Bahlis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRAD51BortezomibHomologous recombinationDNA repairBiologyMolecular biologyTransfectionProteasomeGenome instabilityDNA damageProteasome inhibitorUbiquitin-conjugating enzymeDNAUbiquitinCell biologyGeneUbiquitin ligaseGeneticsMultiple myelomaImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1834 Background: Chromosomal instability is a defining feature of clonal MM plasma cells resulting in the perpetual accumulation of genomic aberrations. In addition to its role in protein homeostasis the ubiquitin-proteasome system is also involved in the regulation of DNA damage repair proteins. We have recently reported that proteasome inhibition induces a BRCAness state in MM cells (MM) resulting in a contextual synthetic lethality when combined with PARP inhibitors. We now report on the mechanisms by which bortezomib impairs homologous recombination (HR) mediated repair of DNA double stranded breaks (DNA-DSBs). Methods and results: Using the DR-GFP/SceI reporter assay in which cells are transfected with a plasmid tandemly expressing mutated GFP genes (5'-Sce/GFP – truncated IGFP-3') and followed by infection with an adenovirus (AdNGUS24i) expressing the yeast Sce endonuclease, we have confirmed that treatment with bortezomib does severely impair HR in MM cells. At the transcriptional level, proteasome inhibition transiently (6–12 hours post treatment) reduced the mRNA expression of several HR and DNA damage repair genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51 and FANCD2) followed by recovery to baseline levels by 24 hours. This transient downregulation of these DNA damage repair genes was also confirmed in a promoter luciferase reporter screen. At the post-trancriptional level, examining the dynamics and kinetics of DNA-DSBs repair induced by radiation therapy or PARP inhibition, we have demonstrated that bortezomib does not alter the initial phase of DNA damage sensing (MRN complex recruitment, ATM and H2AX phosphorylation and MDC1 activation) but does impair the Lys63-poly-ubiquitylation of histones γH2AX and H2A. This histone ubiquitylation is a required modification for the second wave of DNA repair proteins recruitment and retention of BRCA1 and RAD51 at the sites of DNA-DSBs. Furthermore, we have shown that bortezomib treatment depleted the nuclear pools of ubiquitin and abrogated the poly-ubiquitylation (lack of co-localization poly-Ub FK2 foci with γH2AX), but not the phosphorylation and foci formation of histone H2AX. Therefore, bortezomib appears to impair histones (H2AX and H2A) poly-ubiquitylation, a process that is dependent on the activation and recruitment of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases RNF8 and RNF-168 as well as the ubiquitin-E2 conjugating enzyme UBC13 to the sites of DNA-DSBs. Western blot analysis of the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of cellular extracts, revealed that bortezomib dramatically reduced the nuclear accumulation of UBC13 in response to DNA-DSBs as well as the formation of UBC13-Ubiquitin thiolester bonds formation and hence impaired the transfer of ubiquitin to nucleosomal histones. Conclusion: Our studies demonstrate that proteasome inhibition with bortezomib severely impairs homology-mediated repair of DNA breaks in MM cells at the post-transcriptional level by altering the nuclear accumulation and function of the E2-ubiquitin conjugating enzyme UBC13. These results explain the observed clinical synergy between bortezomib and several DNA damaging agents and support further clinical investigation of the combination of these class of drugs in MM patients. Disclosures: Neri: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→