Optimization Of Stepwise Hematopoietic Differentiation Of Human iPSCs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Since their discovery in 2006, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with their ES cell-like self-renewal and differentiation capability, are set to revolutionize the field of regenerative medicine. There is tremendous interest in the field of hematology for derivation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and hematopoietic progenitors (HPCs) by in vitro differentiation of IPSCs. IPSCs can be differentiated into HSC/HPCs by coculture on feeder cells, such as OP9, or by using stepwise differentiation protocols on defined media. Neither approach produces high yields of HSCs or HPCs. With an intention to improve this, we systematically investigated various parameters for in vitro differentiation of iPSCs into HPCs. iPSCs were derived from human adult dermal fibroblasts by transduction with the Yamanaka retroviral vectors (encoding human Klf4, Oct3/4, Sox2 and cMyc) or by electroporation with the Yamanaka Epstein–Barr virus-based episomal plasmid vectors (encoding Klf4, Oct3/4, Sox2, L-Myc and p53 targeting shRNA). One iPSC clone of each variety was then subjected to a stepwise differentiation protocol described by Niwa and coworkers [PLoSOne. (2011); 6(7):e22261] followed by hematopoietic colony forming (CFU) assays in MethoCult (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, Canada). The original protocol calls for the use of Stemline II serum-free medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with various growth factors/cytokines. We investigated the use of APEL medium described by Ng and coworkers [Nature Protocols. (2008); 3(5): 768] as a possible substitute for Stemline II. We also tested the effect of varying the number of colonies seeded in 6-well plates and the efficiency of hematopoietic differentiation after seeding iPSCs as single cells. The results, based on the number of hematopoietic colonies obtained in MethoCult following differentiation, showed that the APEL medium (>100 CFU/100,000 cells) was a superior substitute to the Stemline II medium (<10 CFU/100,000). When IPSCs were seeded as single cells, at initial densities of 10, 100 or 1,000 cells/cm2 in the presence of Y-27632 Rock inhibitor, only the cells at starting density higher than 1,000 per cm2survived but did not yield hematopoietic CFUs in MethoCult. When seeded as colony fragments, lower density of seeding in 6-well plates (< 20 colonies/well) was superior to higher density (>50 colonies/well) for obtaining HPCs. Other parameters that can affect differentiation, such as bone-morphopoietic protein (BMP) and O2 concentration, are being investigated. Figure A. Cellular markers detected at different time points of stepwise hematopoietic differentiation. B. CFUs in MethoCult. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".