In Vivo Genome Editing in Neonatal Mouse Liver Preferentially Utilizes Homology Directed Repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Genome editing has the potential to provide long-term therapeutic gene expression in vivo. We have previously demonstrated efficient editing in a mouse model of hemophilia B through liver-directed adeno-associated viral vector (AAV) delivery of a zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) pair and a corrective donor. We determined that homology is not necessary to achieve efficient levels of genome editing in adult mice, consistent with the fact that quiescent cells, including adult hepatocytes, are not thought to be amenable to homology directed repair (HDR). As a consequence of the donor containing a splice acceptor, both HDR and homology independent vector integration are capable of driving human factor 9 (hF.IX) expression. In this study we sought to determine whether hF.IX expression in mice treated as neonates, undergoing substantial hepatocyte proliferation, is predominantly the result of HDR or homology independent genome editing. Provided the efficacy is not substantially reduced, an HDR dependent approach would impose additional constraints on targeting. Treatment of neonatal hF9mut mice (harboring the ZFN target site) with 1x1011 vg AAV8-ZFN and 5x1011 vg AAV8-Donor via retro-orbital injection resulted in a drastic difference in hF.IX expression between donors with and without homology 10 weeks post injection (Homology: 1531 ± 174.5 ng/mL vs. No-homology: 146.1 ± 5.8 ng/mL; n=12 and 7, respectively). We next asked whether HDR could be stimulated even more specifically through the induction of DNA single strand breaks at the target site. We treated neonatal mice with homologous or non-homologous donors, as well as ZFNs or ZFNickases (in which one FokI nuclease domain was inactivated with the D450A mutation). ZFNickases were indeed active, resulting in ~250 ng/mL hF.IX 4 weeks post injection (Figure 1). Interestingly, we could not detect hF.IX in mice treated with ZFNickase and no-homology donor (LOD: 15ng/mL). To rule out the possibility that this was simply due to the lower efficacy of ZFNickases compared to ZFNs, we increased the ZFNickase dose 4 fold. Four weeks post treatment, we observed substantial levels of hF.IX in mice treated with homologous donor (2041 ± 269 ng/mL) and were again unable to detect hF.IX in mice treated with the non-homologous donor (n=10 and 7, respectively). These data point to homology directed repair as the primary mechanism of protein production for genome editing in neonatal mouse liver, and suggest improvements in both efficacy and specificity can be made through deeper understanding of the molecular requirements of this approach. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Anguela: Spark Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Doyon:Sangamo BioSciences: Employment. Wechsler:Sangamo BioSciences: Employment. Paschon:Sangamo BioSciences: Employment. Davidson:Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy. Gregory:Sangamo BioSciences: Employment. Holmes:Sangamo BioSciences: Employment. High:Spark Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".