MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551042557 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.227.227

Mutated EZH2 Collaborates with Myc in Inducing Lymphoma in a Mouse Model

2011· article· en· W2551042557 on OpenAlexaff
Tobias Berg, Damian Yap, Silvia Thoene, Tracee Wee, Nathalie Schoeler, Patricia Umlandt, Harry Chang, Lisa Yue, David Lai, Grace H.W. Cheng, Ryan D. Morin, Martin Hirst, Marco A. Marra, Gregg B. Morin, Randy D. Gascoyne, Samuel Aparício, R. Keith Humphries

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEZH2LymphomaGerminal centerCancer researchBiologyTransgeneFollicular lymphomaGenetically modified mouseSpleenMolecular biologyImmunologyB cellGeneticsAntibodyHistoneGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 227 The histone methyl-transferase EZH2 is frequently mutated in germinal-center derived diffuse-large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma. We and others have demonstrated that these mutations in tyrosine 641 of EZH2 represent a dominant gain-of-function, enhancing the capability to trimethylate H3K27 in combination with wildtype activity (Yap et al, Blood 2011; Sneeringer et al, PNAS 2010). To further test if these EZH2 mutations can be driver mutations in lymphomagenesis we have now generated and characterized a mouse line transgenic for EZH2 Y641F (the most commonly observed mutant form). Transgenic mice were created on the C57/Bl6 background by pronuclear microinjection of a construct where EZH2 Y641F is expressed from a lymphoid specific Emu-lck promoter. Spleen cells isolated from the transgenic mice displayed a global increase in H3K27me3 when analyzed by Western Blot. However none of the mice showed signs of lymphoma even when observed for prolonged periods of time. As EZH2 mutations often coincide with other mutations in lymphoma, we also combined the expression of EZH2 Y641F with the over-expression of Myc by crossing one of the transgenic lines with Emu-myc transgenic mice. In this combination model, we observed a dramatic acceleration of lymphoma development with the combination of Myc and EZH2 Y641F as compared to Myc alone (Myc alone (n=26) 137.5 days, Myc+EZH2 Y641F (n=20) 51 days, p < 0.0001 Log-Rank (Mantel-Cox) Test). The resulting lymphomas are characterized by a generalized massive lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly (spleen weight 0.416 +/− 0.133 g), bone marrow infiltration (72 +/− 8 %) and lymphocytosis (WBC 138.5 +/− 77.1 ×1000/μl). They show histological features of high-grade disease, and initiate disease in secondary recipients. In contrast to lymphomas observed with Emu-myc alone, all of the lymphomas observed in mice transgenic for both, Myc and EZH2 Y641F, presented with a mature B cell phenotype (B220+IgM+). This shift in differentiation can also be observed in the bone marrow even before development of overt lymphomas. While Myc transgenics mainly show an increase in the B220+IgM−compartment, this is shifted towards B220+IgM+ in double transgenics. Cell cycle analysis by in vivo Brdu incorporation before disease onset shows a drastic increase in the fraction of cells in cycle in the splenic B cells of double transgenic mice (43.3 and 44.9 % cells in S phase) as compared to mice transgenic for Myc alone (10.6 % and 14.2 % cells in S phase). Southern Blot analysis using a probe specific for JH4 showed more than one clonal rearrangement in a majority of the lymphomas in the double-transgenic mice. In summary, EZH2 Y641F can collaborate with Emu-myc in high efficiency lymphoma induction. This new murine lymphoma model now provides a powerful tool to study global changes in the epigenome caused by this frequent mutation and may be a useful system for testing novel treatments. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207