MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557605270 · doi:10.1352/2326-6988-4.4.226

Social Inclusion: A Proposed Framework to Inform Policy and Service Outcomes Evaluation

2016· article· en· W2557605270 on OpenAlexaff
Virginie Cobigo, Roy I. Brown, Yves Lachapelle, Rosemary Lysaght, Lynn Martin, Hélène Ouellette‐Kuntz, Heather Stuart, Casey Fulford

Bibliographic record

VenueInclusion · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsCasey HouseQueen's UniversityUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversity of VictoriaLakehead UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)Perspective (graphical)Service (business)ConventionPublic relationsEconomic growthPolitical scienceSociologyPublic economicsPsychologySocial psychologyBusinessSocial scienceEconomicsComputer scienceMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social inclusion is recognized as a fundamental right in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities (2006). Inclusion is also an explicit goal for community-based services in many countries. However, existing definitions of social inclusion are insufficient to support the development of policies and services, and the evaluation of their success in promoting social inclusion. Furthermore, existing definitions and measures tend to overlook the perspective of persons with disabilities and their significant others. Using a consensus building strategy, we developed a framework of social inclusion, which included the perspective of adults with intellectual disability. The proposed framework supports the development and evaluation of social inclusion policies and service outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.014
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.404 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInclusionSame topicCommunity Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207