MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558064711 · doi:10.1107/s2053273314087142

Structural, Functional and Dynamic Studies of F Plasmid T4SS Proteins

2014· article· en· W2558064711 on OpenAlexaff
Gerald F. Audette

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriplasmic spacePlasmidPilusBacterial conjugationEscherichia coliBiologyMutantPopulationBacteriaGeneticsChemistryGeneCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transfer of genetic material within a bacterial population through the process of conjugation distributes novel genetic elements for survival in unique environments. Bacterial conjugation is important to public health as the spread antibiotic resistance genes among bacteria results in multi-drug resistance. Indeed, approximately 70% of bacteria that cause hospital-acquired infections are resistant to at least one antibiotic. Conjugative systems, such as the F plasmid of Escherichia coli, consist of proteins that share similarities to type IV secretion systems (T4SS). T4SS proteins of the F plasmid form a membrane spanning protein complex and surface exposed pilus. The periplasmic T4SS proteins TraF, TraW and TrbC play important roles during the F pilus assembly and DNA transfer. Functional analysis of a series of TraF mutants has shown that modification to TraF abolishes pilus synthesis and in turn F plasmid conjugation. In addition, dynamic analysis of TraF using time-resolved hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry has revealed a well structured C-terminal thioredoxin-like domain and a more dynamic N-terminal domain that is predicted to interact with companion T4SS protein TraH. In addition, interaction analysis of the putative pore forming proteins TraW and TrbC indicate that the C-terminal domain of TrbC is not required for interaction with TraW, unlike previous models of F T4SS assembly. Rather the C-terminal domain of TraW preferentially interacts with the N-terminal domain of TrbC. These studies are providing a clearer picture of the structures and interactions that occur within the F T4SS assembly during the conjugative process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207