MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559722650 · doi:10.1071/rdv29n1ab70

70 XBP1 DYSREGULATION BY CRISPR/Cas9-MEDIATED GENE EDITING DURING PORCINE EMBRYO EARLY DEVELOPMENT

2016· article· en· W2559722650 on OpenAlexaff
Karina Gutierrez, Werner Giehl Glanzner, Naomi Dicks, Rodrigo Camponogara Bohrer, Luke Currin, Laura Michalovic, Luis B. Agellon, Vilceu Bordignon

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXBP1BiologyUnfolded protein responseCell biologyEndoplasmic reticulumCas9EmbryoCRISPRMolecular biologyGeneticsGeneRNARNA splicing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early developing embryos are very sensitive to their developmental milieu. For instance, variations in temperature, pH, or culture media composition can trigger endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Endoplasmic reticulum stress has been shown to reduce early embryo development and embryo quality. In response to ER stress, embryos activate coping mechanisms, such as the unfolded protein response, to re-establish ER homeostasis. The X box binding protein (XBP1) is one of the main transducers of the unfolded protein response. Under ER stress, XBP1 mRNA is unconventionally spliced by IRE1a to yield its activated isoform (XBP1s), which allows expression of genes involved in protein folding, transport, and degradation. XBP1s has been detected in oocytes and early stage embryos of different species, including Drosophila, Xenopus, zebrafish, mice, and pigs, suggesting an important role during early embryo development. In this study, we used the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing technology to investigate the effect of XBP1 dysregulation during development of porcine embryos in vitro. Pig zygotes were produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection using in vitro-matured oocytes. Treatments consisted of (a) Cas9 mRNA (Cas9) + 1 single guide RNAs targeting XBP1 gene region 1 (sgRNA-1); (b) Cas9 + 1 single guide RNAs targeting XBP1 gene region 2 (sgRNA-2); (c) Cas9 + sgRNA-1 + sgRNA-2; (d) Cas9 alone; and (e) sgRNA-1 + sgRNA-2. After injection, embryos were cultured in vitro for 5 to 7 days to assess development and cell numbers. Experiments were repeated 5 or more times, and data were analysed by ANOVA and means compared using Student’s t-test or Tukey–Kramer Honestly Significant Difference test. Embryo cleavage was similar between the groups (a = 59.8 ± 4.9%, b = 58.8 ± 5.3%, c = 68.86 ± 2.2%, d = 66.4 ± 5.9%, and e = 70.10 ± 1.9%), but development to the blastocyst stage was substantially reduced (P < 0.05) in the groups injected with Cas9 + sgRNAs (a = 18 ± 4.5%, b = 16 ± 1.5%, and c = 5.3 ± 2.8%) compared with controls (d = 33.7 ± 6.2% and e = 31.4 ± 1.2%). Moreover, we observed that only 22.7% of the embryos treated with Cas9 + sgRNA-1 + sgRNA-2 were able to develop beyond 8-cell stage compared with 62.5% in the control group injected with Cas9 alone. These findings suggest that XBP1 activity is required for maintenance of ER homeostasis and development of porcine embryos beyond the main period of embryo genome activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.355
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207