MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2560185331

ETHICAL CHALLENGES: RESEARCH ON INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE EXPERIENCES OF PREGNANT IMMIGRANT WOMEN

2014· article· en· W2560185331 on OpenAlexaff
Fatema Begum, Christine A. Walsh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomestic violenceImmigrationPregnancyEthical issuesPsychologySuicide preventionPoison controlMedicineCriminologySociologyEngineering ethicsPolitical scienceLawMedical emergencyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While studies show that women are at heightened risk for violence during pregnancy, there is a gap in understanding the realities of pregnant immigrant women who experience intimate partner violence (IPV). This paper presents a review of the research on IPV of pregnant immigrant women, and examines specific ethical dilemmas that may emerge while conducting research in this field. We also discuss specific practices and examples in the literature to overcome these ethical challenges and offer suggestions for addressing these issues in culturally safe and appropriate ways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.038
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.067
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0380.067
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0100.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntimate Partner and Family Violence→French-language works237,207→