MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2561439902 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-2465

Abstract 2465: Targeting HER2-positive brain metastases by incorporating the brain-penetrant Angiopep-2 peptide to an anti-HER2 antibody and anti-HER2 antibody drug conjugate

2015· article· en· W2561439902 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Demeule, Sanjoy Das, Christian Ché, Gaoqiang Yang, Jean-Christophe Currie, Simon Lord‐Dufour, Sasmita Tripathy, Anthony Régina, Jean‐Paul Castaigne, Jean E. Lachowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsAngiochem (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscytosisIn vitroMonoclonal antibodyAntibodyCancer researchDocetaxelChemistryPharmacologyTrastuzumabBlood–brain barrierReceptor tyrosine kinaseReceptorBiologyCancerBiochemistryImmunologyMedicineInternal medicineCentral nervous systemBreast cancerEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Monoclonal antibodies directed against receptor tyrosine kinases such as HER2 have been demonstrated to reduce tumor size and increase survival. However, these agents achieve little to no brain penetration, making them ineffective against metastatic brain tumors. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), efficient at restricting entry of proteins such as mAbs and anticancer drugs into the brain, is comprised of capillary endothelial cells with tight junctions and efflux pumps. We have created a family of peptides (Angiopeps) which use receptor-mediated transcytosis to enter the brain. Conjugation of the Angiopep-2 (An2) to confer brain permeability has been validated for small molecules (ANG 1005, Phase II), peptides and proteins. The brain-penetrant An2 has also been incorporated to a humanized anti-HER2 mAb. This Angiopep-Antibody Conjugate, ANG4043, displays HER2 binding affinity and in vitro cytotoxic potency similar to that of native anti-HER2. ANG4043 demonstrates a high rate of entry into the brain. ANG4043 reduces the tumor size of BT-474 human breast cancer cells when implanted in the brain, consistent with achieving therapeutic concentrations. Here we describe chemical conjugation between three molecules: the An2, a cytotoxic drug (docetaxel or maytansine), and a mAb directed against HER2. These new An2-antibody-drug-conjugates (An2-ADCs) show a higher in vitro anti-proliferative potency than unconjugated mAb against HER2+ BT-474 and HC-19554 cells that are sensitive and resistant to Herceptin, respectively. Furthermore, they demonstrate a high rate of entry into the brain when compared to controls, leading to a reduction in brain tumor size and to an increase in the survival of mice bearing intracranial BT-474 tumors. Furthermore, An2-anti-HER2 derivatives are also efficacious in peripheral tissues since they inhibited the growth of subcutaneous BT-474 luciferase tumors. Overall, these data demonstrate that the conjugation of an Angiopep to therapeutic mAbs or ADCs can increase their efficacy in the CNS without affecting their anticancer properties outside of the brain. These results extend the validation of Angiopep conjugation beyond small anticancer drugs to include larger molecules such as therapeutic mAbs and ADCs for development of new brain-penetrant therapeutics for brain malignancies. Citation Format: Michel Demeule, Sanjoy Das, Christian Che, Gaoqiang Yang, Jean-Christophe Currie, Simon Lord-Dufour, Sasmita Tripathy, Anthony Regina, Jean-Paul Castaigne, Jean E. Lachowicz. Targeting HER2-positive brain metastases by incorporating the brain-penetrant Angiopep-2 peptide to an anti-HER2 antibody and anti-HER2 antibody drug conjugate. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2465. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2465

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→