MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2562564284 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-727

Abstract 727: Signaling redundancy between EGFR and c-Met: molecular analysis of concurrent inhibition of c-Src and therapeutic potential against prostate cancer

2015· article· en· W2562564284 on OpenAlexaff
Suman Rao, Anne‐Laure Larroque‐Lombard, Ben Allal, Bertrand J. Jean‐Claude

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGefitinibDU145CrizotinibCancer researchEpidermal growth factor receptorEGFR inhibitorsProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcLapatinibTyrosine kinaseDasatinibGrowth factor receptorC-MetPharmacologyBiologyMedicineCancerProstate cancerReceptorLung cancerHepatocyte growth factorInternal medicineBreast cancerTrastuzumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Overexpression of growth factor receptors is often associated with advanced stage disease and poor prognosis. Importantly, they can interact with other growth factor receptors and non-receptor tyrosine kinases to promote proliferation, survival, invasion and metastasis. One such signaling crosstalk occurs between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met) that are overexpressed in tumours. The amplification of c-Met in tumours overexpressing EGFR leads to signaling redundancy that causes resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Furthermore, the non-receptor tyrosine kinase c-Src has been shown to synergize with EGFR to promote tumour progression and to mediate the crosstalk between EGFR and c-Met. In order to investigate the mechanisms associated with the EGFR-c-Met-c-Src axis, we sought to identify tumour cell lines responding to the dual-inhibition of EGFR and c-Met and the triple-inhibition of EGFR, c-Met and c-Src using pharmacological inhibitions. We identified two androgen independent prostate cancer cell lines with exquisite sensitivity to EGFR-, c-Met-, c-Src-based combinations: DU145 and PC3. The results showed that the combination of crizotinib (c-Met inhibitor) + gefitinib (EGFR inhibitor) was 2-5-fold more potent (DU145 IC50 = 1.9 μM, PC3 IC50 = 1.9 μM) than the drugs alone in growth inhibition assay. Furthermore, the addition of dasatinib (c-Src inhibitor) to the crizotinib + gefitinib combination further enhanced its potency (DU145 IC50 = 0.003 μM, PC3 IC50 = 0.009 μM). When compared with individual drugs, equieffective combinations of gefitinib with crizotinib showed 2-3-fold superior potency in blocking invasion and inducing cytotoxicity. More importantly, the addition of dasatinib to the crizotinib + gefitinib combination significantly enhanced anti-invasive potency and cell-killing by apoptosis. Analysis of signaling crosstalk between the three kinases showed that dasatinib alone or in combination induced re-phosphorylation of c-Src, EGFR, c-Met and STAT3, particularly after 2-6h of drug exposure. The results indicate that these apparent compensatory re-phosphorylation mechanisms induced by dasatinib did not affect the overall potency of the triple combination. Given the role of these three tyrosine kinases in driving proliferation, invasion and survival of cancer cells, our work suggests that triple-inhibition is required for optimal antitumour activity in cells co-expressing EGFR and c-Met. Citation Format: Suman Rao, Anne-Laure Larroque-Lombard, Ben Allal, Bertrand J. Jean-Claude. Signaling redundancy between EGFR and c-Met: molecular analysis of concurrent inhibition of c-Src and therapeutic potential against prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 727. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-727

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→