MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Relative Bioavailability Study of Three Dose Strengths and Four Dose Levels of SD-809, a Potential Treatment for Movement Disorders (P1.054)

2016· article· en· W2562590154 on OpenAlexaff
David Stamler, Margaret Bradbury, Lisa De Boer, Elliot Offman

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsCelerion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioavailabilityMovement disordersMedicineInternal medicinePharmacologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: SD-809 (deutetrabenazine) is a VMAT-2 inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of hyperkinetic movement disorders. Previous studies have shown that the active metabolites of SD-809, total (α+β)-dihydrodeutetrabenazine (HTBZ), have a half-life of approximately 9 hours, reducing the need for frequent dosing. Twice daily administration of dose strengths 6 mg, 12 mg, 18 mg and 24 mg has been developed as a potential treatment for treatment of chorea associated with Huntington’s disease. Objectives: Evaluate the relative bioavailability, dose proportionality and safety of single doses of 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-mg doses of SD-809 under fed conditions. Methods: Thirty-two healthy subjects, with either an extensive (EM) or intermediate (IM) CYP2D6 phenotype, were randomly assigned to an SD-809 treatment sequence in this open-label crossover study. Sequential plasma samples were collected in each period and assayed for SD-809, α-HTBZ, and β-HTBZ by validated LC-MS/MS methods. Exposure parameters for total d6-(α+β)-HTBZ were calculated as the sum of α-and β-HTBZ metabolites. Results: Based on regression models for evaluation of proportionality, total (α+β)-HTBZ increased linearly with doses between 6 and 24 mg and the dose normalized 90[percnt] CI for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUCinf fell within 80[percnt] to 125[percnt] equivalence limits. Ten (31[percnt]) subjects experienced adverse events and no severe or serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Following single-dose administration of SD-809 from 6-24 mg, the active metabolites demonstrated dose proportional pharmacokinetics under fed conditions. SD-809 was well tolerated in healthy subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207