MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2565239144 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-2526

Abstract 2526: Detection of Ara-CTP following exposure to CPX-351 and potentiation of action by fludarabine in leukemia cell lines using a bioluminescent bacterial biosensor

2015· article· en· W2565239144 on OpenAlexaff
Lawrence D. Mayer, Elizabeth Anderson, Heather K. Bone, Gareth Robinson, Garreth Reynolds, Vyvyan C. Salisbury

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Canadian institutionsCelator Pharmaceuticals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFludarabineCytarabineIntracellularPharmacologyChemistryBiologyLeukemiaBiochemistryMedicineImmunologyInternal medicineCyclophosphamideChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Cytarabine (ara-C) is a well-established agent widely used for treating AML. At relapse its use clinically has been combined with the purine analogue fludarabine plus idarubicin and G-CSF (FLAG-Ida). Fludarabine is known to potentiate intracellular accumulation of the active cytotoxic metabolite ara-CTP from ara-C via inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase and the normal formation of endogenous dCTP. CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation of a synergistic 5:1 molar ratio of ara-C and DNR, currently in a Phase III trial versus 7+3 ara-C/DNR in newly diagnosed elderly high risk (secondary) AML patients. The aim of the study here was to utilize the well-established Escherichia coli HA1 whole-cell biosensor to measure intracellular ara-C and ara-CTP following in vitro exposure of human immortalised leukemic cell lines to CPX-351, and to assess the ability of fludarabine to potentiate intracellular ara-CTP formation. Methods: Biosensor E. coli HA1 has been engineered to produce a bioluminescent output in response to ara-C. The bacterial biosensor is able to monitor both ara-C and ara-CTP by measuring signals in the absence and presence of alkaline phosphatase, respectively. A range of in vivo-relevant ara-C concentrations (5-50 μM) and incubation times (1-4 hours) were tested. Results: Free ara-C+DNR produced an increase in bioluminescence (and hence ara-CTP) at each time-point tested in line with previous results. Incubation with CPX-351 required a longer time-period to result in similar levels of ara-CTP, but a dose-dependent increase was noted, with the highest increase produced using 4-hour incubation of CPX-351 at a concentration of 25 μM. This delay was consistent with previously observed kinetics of liposomal drug uptake by leukemia cells. Following optimisation of in vitro dosing, potentiation of ara-CTP generation was assessed following 4-hour incubation with fludarabine (5 μM), a dose previously shown to increase ara-CTP accumulation in susceptible cell lines. Potentiation of ara-CTP generation from CPX-351 was observed in three of the four cell lines tested, with the largest increase observed in THP-1 cells. No potentiation was observed in CCRF-CEM cells, in line with previous findings with ara-C. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the ability of fludarabine to potentiate formation of ara-CTP upon exposure of leukemia cells to CPX-351, suggesting a favourable impact on efficacy for this combination. Additional testing in ex vivo blasts from AML patients may be warranted to support the further investigation of this combination. Citation Format: Lawrence D. Mayer, Elizabeth Anderson, Heather Bone, Gareth Robinson, Garreth Reynolds, Vyvyan Salisbury. Detection of Ara-CTP following exposure to CPX-351 and potentiation of action by fludarabine in leukemia cell lines using a bioluminescent bacterial biosensor. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2526. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2526

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer therapeutics and mechanismsFrench-language works237,207