Expression of the Cardiac Maintenance and Survival Factor FGF-16 Gene Is Regulated by Csx/Nkx2.5 and Is an Early Target of Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 16 gene (Fgf-16) is preferentially expressed by neonatal cardiomyocytes after birth, with levels increasing into adulthood. Null mice and isolated heart studies suggest a role for FGF-16 in cardiac maintenance and survival, including increased resistance to doxorubicin (DOX)-induced injury. However, the effect of DOX on endogenous FGF-16 synthesis and specifically regulation of cardiac Fgf-16 expression has not been reported. Here we assess the effect of DOX on FGF-16 RNA levels and stability as well as promoter activity and use sequence analysis, knockdown, and overexpression to investigate the role of cardiac transcription factor(s) implicated in the response. Endogenous FGF-16 RNA levels were reduced >70% in 8-week-old rats treated with 15 mg DOX/kg for 6 h. This was modeled in neonatal rat cardiomyocyte cultures, where an equivalent decrease was also seen within 6 h of 1 μM DOX treatment. Six kilobases of mouse Fgf-16 upstream flanking and promoter DNA was also assessed for DOX responsiveness in transfected cardiomyocytes. A decrease in FGF-16 promoter activity was seen with only 747 base pairs containing the Fgf-16 TATA box that includes a putative and highly conserved binding site for the cardiac transcription factor Csx/Nkx2.5. There was also no effect of DOX on FGF-16 RNA stability, consistent with transcriptional control. Levels and binding of Csx/Nkx2.5 to the FGF-16 promoter were reduced with DOX treatment. Knockdown of Csx/Nkx2.5 specifically decreased endogenous FGF-16 RNA and protein levels, whereas Csx/Nkx2.5 overexpression stimulated levels, and increased resistance to the rapid DOX-induced depletion of FGF-16. These observations indicate that Fgf-16 expression is directly regulated by Csx/Nkx2.5 in neonatal cardiomyocytes, and a negative effect of DOX on Csx/Nkx2.5 and, thus, endogenous FGF-16 synthesis may contribute indirectly to its cardiotoxic effects. Targeting FGF-16 levels could, however, offer increased resistance to cardiac injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".