555. Development of a Post-Exposure Treatment for Ebola Virus Infections Based on AAV Vectors and Zmapp Antibody Cocktail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recent Ebola outbreak in West Africa has been the deadliest in the history. To prevent future recurrence of such outbreak, better treatments and effective vaccines against Ebola virus are desirable. Among such promising treatments, the Zmapp cocktail containing neutralizing antibodies (13C6, 2G4 and 4G7) has successfully treated some patients. However, the feasibility of using it on large populations especially in developing countries is questionable. To address this potential issue, we propose to employ recombinant vectors derived from adeno-associated virus (rAAV). There are several advantages of using rAAV: because of 1) their safety profile; 2) only one injection (or a few) would be required; 3) the high stability of lyophilized rAAVs at ambient temperature and; 4) the panel of available serotypes. Because of these interesting features, we are currently developing a treatment based on three rAAVs to deliver the genes for the Zmapp cocktail of antibodies. We have already produced at small scale a rAAV expressing the 2G4 antibody. The DNA sequences for the heavy chain and light chains were codon-optimized for better expression in humans and were designed to be expressed from the same gene. A strong promoter (CAG) resistant to silencing in vivo was chosen to drive gene expression of the antibody. The rAAV were produced by transfection using our patented cGMP compatible HEK293 cell line. The production was performed in suspension culture in the absence of serum. Secretion of 2G4 antibody by rAAV transduced cells (HEK293 and CHO cells) was confirmed. The results demonstrated that rAAV-CAG-2G4 was functional and allowed for the correct assembly of the heavy and light chains of 2G4. Purification of 200 mL of rAAV-CAG-2G4 production was performed by ultracentrifugation on an iodixanol density-step gradient. Two other rAAVs coding 13C6 and 4G7 antibodies are in the processed of being constructed and produced in a similar manner. We are also in the process of comparing the efficacy of two serotypes of AAV (9 and DJ) in mice by intranasal delivery. Using the best serotype, the rAAVs will be produced and purified from a starting suspension culture of 20 L. Their efficacy for treating Ebola infections will then be evaluated in a mouse model infected by the virus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".