MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Acetylation of a Conserved Lysine Residue within Activation Domain One of E2A Transcription Factors Plays a Role in Transcriptional Regulation.

2006· article· en· W2573055599 on OpenAlexaff
Brandy D. Hyndman, Richard Bayly, David P. LeBrun

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcetylationHistoneLysineTranscription factorChromatinBiologyP300-CBP Transcription FactorsBromodomainHistone H3Transcriptional regulationTranscription (linguistics)Activator (genetics)Cell biologyMolecular biologyChemistryGeneticsGeneHistone AcetyltransferasesAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The E2A locus encodes transcription factors, called E12 and E47, involved in lineage-specific cellular differentiation. The locus is also involved in chromosomal translocations associated with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the most common of which results in expression of the oncoprotein E2A-PBX1. We showed recently that direct interaction between E2A and the histone acetyl-transferase (AT) and transcriptional co-activator proteins CBP/p300 is required in leukemogenesis by E2A-PBX1. E2A proteins have also been shown to interact with another AT/co-activator, p/CAF. Interaction with these AT proteins results in acetylation of E2A proteins themselves. Here we map the acetylated lysine residues within the oncogenic portion of E2A proteins and begin to elucidate some functional correlates of E2A acetylation. Our results indicate that the isolated AT domain of p/CAF as well as full-length p/CAF were capable of acetylating E2A. Interestingly, full-length p300 was capable of acetylating E2A while an isolated AT domain was unable to acetylate E2A, suggesting that additional domains of CBP/p300 are required to mediate E2A acetylation. We demonstrate that both p300 and p/CAF can interact directly with E2A, independent of the known interaction between p300 and p/CAF. These co-activators do, however, appear to co-operate to achieve maximal E2A acetylation. Mutagenesis-based mapping studies indicate that several lysines are substrates for acetylation. Of particular interest, a conserved lysine residue (K34) located within the N-terminal transcriptional activation domain (AD1) is acetylated in vitro by p/CAF. K34 is located within a GKXXP consensus sequence, suggested to be a recognition motif for acetylation by several AT enzymes including CBP/p300 and p/CAF. Conservative replacement of K34 with arginine (i.e., K43R) substantially impairs transcriptional activation of a luciferase reporter gene by E2A, suggesting that post-translational modification of this residue may play an important functional role. Consistent with a role for acetylation, relative to some other lysine-dependent modification, we were unable to demonstrate sumoylation or ubiquitination of the N-terminus of E2A. Therefore, we have found that acetylation by AT/co-activator proteins contributes to transcriptional regulation by the functionally critical N-terminal activation domain (AD1) of E2A proteins. The mechanisms by which this acetylation event is regulated and how it contributes to target gene induction by E2A are not clear. It seems plausible that the acetylation status of AD1 could be determined by upstream signaling events and acetylation of E2A could modulate interactions with transcriptional co-regulators, DNA or chromatin. Further studies to investigate these possibilities are underway. In particular, results using an amino acid substitution that mimics acetylation of AD1 (K34Q) will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207