MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2583946286 · doi:10.1056/nejmc1611639

Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 Infection despite Preexposure Prophylaxis

2017· letter· en· W2583946286 on OpenAlexaff
David Knox, Peter L. Anderson, P. Richard Harrigan, Darrell H. S. Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsAIDS VancouverSt. Michael's HospitalMaple Leaf Medical Clinic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Pre-exposure prophylaxisMultiple drug resistanceIntensive care medicineVirologyImmunologyDrug resistanceMen who have sex with menMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors reply: Gerhard raises an important question.Iron overload and advanced liver disease have been associated with V. vulnificus infection, specifically with septicemia, 1 and experimental models support enhanced vibrio replication in iron-rich environments. 2Isolated cases of hemochromatosis diagnosis after V. vulnificus wound infection have been reported. 3However, we are aware of no epidemiologic studies of V. vulnificus wound infection and iron overload.Given the recognized association of V. vulnificus infection with liver disease, which is often coincident with iron overload, we agree that it is prudent for patients with liver disease or iron overload to take precautions with shellfish exposure.In the absence of other indicators of hemochromatosis, the usefulness of screening patients with V. vulnificus infection for this diagnosis remains uncertain.In our patient, iron studies revealed a depressed serum iron level of 16 μg per deciliter (normal range, 40 to 159) and a calculated transferrin saturation of 7% (normal range, 25 to 45).These findings were consistent with hypoferremia induced by acute inflammation, 4 and the values subsequently normalized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0160.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of MedicineSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207