MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2587925217 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now212.893

TMOD-23. DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A NOVEL MODEL OF HUMAN LUNG-TO- BRAIN METASTASIS TO IDENTIFY GENETIC REGULATORS OF BRAIN METASTASIS INITIATING CELLS

2016· article· en· W2587925217 on OpenAlexaff
Mohini Singh, Chitra Venugopal, Tomáš Tokár, Kevin R. Brown, Nicole McFarlane, David Bakhshinyan, Parvez Vora, Maleeha Qazi, Sujeivan Mahendram, Thushyant Vijaykumar, Branavan Manoranjan, Amy H.Y. Tong, Kathrin Durrer, Naresh Murty, Robin Hallet, John A. Hassell, David R. Kaplan, Jean‐Claude Cutz, Igor Jurišica, Jason Moffat, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenOccupational Cancer Research CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrain metastasisMetastasisBiologyCancer researchCancerGene knockdownLung cancerCancer stem cellPathologyMedicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain Metastases (BM) are the most common type of cerebral tumor in adult, occurring at a rate 10 times greater than that of primary brain cancers. The inherent abilities of a primary tumor cell capable of initiating a BM resembles that of a cancer stem cell (CSCs). We hypothesize that a subgroup of CSCs, termed brain metastasis-initiating cells (BMICs), are responsible for the initiation of BM and are identifiable by an exclusive subset of genes that regulate self-renewal and metastasis. Despite the prevalence and lethality of BM, there is no clinically relevant model that fully reflects metastasis in patients. We recently generated a novel human-mouse xenotransplantation model of BM that allows for interrogation of each phase of the metastatic process from lung to brain, through injection of human patient-derived BMICs into immunocompromised mice. Comprehensive interrogation of human BM using RNA interference screens with subsequent validation in our model identified SPOCK1 and TWIST2 as novel regulators of brain metastasis-initiating cell (BMIC) self-renewal and migration to the brain, respectively. A prospective cohort of primary lung cancer specimens showed SPOCK1 and TWIST2 over-expressed only in patients who ultimately developed BM. Protein-protein interaction network mapping identified novel BMIC regulatory genes with significant prognostic value in lung cancer patients. Specifically, the most significant connector between SPOCK1 and TWIST2, INHBA, a TGF-β ligand found mutated in lung adenocarcinoma, showed reduced expression in BMICs with knockdown of SPOCK1, defining a novel pathway between INHBA, SPOCK1 and TWIST2 and implicating the involvement of the TGF-β signaling pathway in BM development. Our development of a novel preclinical model of BM, through which we have identified several novel BMIC regulators, present potential therapeutic targets that could aid in blockage of the metastatic process, and transform a uniformly fatal systemic disease into a locally controlled and eminently more treatable one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207