MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597156732 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/83.s1.267

Transcriptome Analysis of In Vitro- and In Vivo-Produced Preimplantation Porcine Embryos by 454 Pyrosequencing.

2010· article· en· W2597156732 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Tsoi, David Hulce, Megan Manion, Jonathan Liu, Walter T. Dixon, G. R. Foxcroft, Michael K. Dyck

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologycDNA libraryComplementary DNAEmbryoPyrosequencingTranscriptomeGeneticsBlastocystGenomeExpressed sequence tagMolecular biologyGeneComputational biologyEmbryogenesisGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, our understanding of the molecular events during the development of porcine preimplantation embryos is limited. Increased knowledge in this area will contribute to our understanding of basic reproductive biology, will allow for identification of molecular markers related to embryonic quality, and will facilitate improvement to in vitro embryo production and culture conditions. The objective of this study was to identify transcripts related to the development of in vitro- (IVT) and in vivo (IVV)-produced porcine embryos using the 454-sequencing platform. Two normalized cDNA libraries were generated from pools of IVT and IVV embryos at different developmental stages (oocyte, 2-cell, 4-cell, 8-cell, morula and blastocyst). In order to facilitate the identification of rare transcripts, TRIMMER kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) was used to decrease the prevalence of abundant transcripts and increase the efficiency of 454 sequencing for discovery of rare copies. A preliminary sequence analysis of the IVT and IVV cDNA libraries from a 1/8 plate run on the 454-Genome Sequencer FLX system (Roche) using the Titanium reagent kit yielded 94,628 and 82,582 ESTs, respectively. NextGENe (SoftGenetics LLC) software was used to identify expressed genes from a variety of porcine sequence databases as references. These reference sequence collections were downloaded from Ensembl: Sus_scrofa.Sscrofa9.56.cdna.abinitio.fa, Sus_scrofa.Sscrofa9.56.cdna.all.fa, and Sus_scrofa.Sscrofa9.56.dna.chromosome.*.fa; and from NCBI: rna.gbk. The collection of chromosomes were indexed using the ‘Build Index for WGA’ (whole genome alignment) tool of NextGENe. An average of 20% of expressed genes matched to the above references in ESTs obtained from both normalized cDNA libraries. Differential expression levels for IVT and IVV embryos were compared using the RPKM (reads per kilobase of exon model per million mapped reads) method and mapped to two databases (the NCBI rna.gbk genome and a combined Ensembl abinitio and cdna-all reference). Some commonly expressed genes were identified, and also, unique genes expressed either in IVT or IVV embryos. The remaining uncharacterized transcripts had significant matches against the EST porcine database. We further annotated the transcripts using the non-porcine mammalian protein database and Gene Ontology terms. This newly found EST resource will be valuable for embryo specific microarray development and for comparative mammalian genome analysis. This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and is a part of the activities of the EmbryoGENE NSERC Strategic Research Network. (poster)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207