A Phase II Study of Enzastaurin, a Protein Kinase C-β (PKCβ) Inhibitor, in the Treatment of Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract PKCβ was identified by gene expression profiling and confirmed by independent analysis as a possible rational therapeutic target for DLBCL. Therefore, we investigated the safety and anti-cancer activity of enzastaurin, an orally administered, potent inhibitor of PKCβ, in this disease. Patients (pts) with relapsed DLBCL, who progressed following CHOP-based (or equivalent) chemotherapy, were enrolled in this phase II, single-arm, US multicenter study. The primary objective was to determine the rate of freedom from progression ≥2 cycles (FFP). Secondary end-points included objective response rate (complete or partial response), and toxicity. Pts initially received an oral dose of 525 mg (capsules) enzastaurin, amended to 500 mg (tablets), once daily, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. One cycle of therapy lasted for 28 days. All 55 enrolled pts received at least 1 dose of enzastaurin, and were included in the safety and efficacy analyses. Of these, 13 pts completed less than 1 cycle of therapy, which is noteworthy because enzastaurin must be administered for 14 days to achieve therapeutic levels. Of the 55 pts evaluated, 27 were men and 28 were women, 47 (85%) had an ECOG performance status of ≤1, and 28 pts had elevated LDH levels. The median age was 68 years (range: 31–87). Pts had received a median number of 2 prior therapies (range: 1–5); 6 pts had also received prior stem-cell transplantation. There were 11 dose omissions due to toxicities, 2 of which were possibly related to the study drug (fatigue and edema). There was only 1 grade 4 toxicity (hypomagnesemia), 1 grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and no grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Other grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (2), edema (1), headache (1), and motor neuropathy (1). Twelve of 55 pts (21.8%, 95% CI: 11.8%–35.0%) were alive and free from progression at the end of 2 cycles. Two of these 12 pts had elevated LDH levels at baseline, which normalized after enzastaurin therapy. Nine pts had stable disease for at least 4 cycles, one of whom achieved a complete response; 2 of the 9 pts had relapsed after prior stem-cell therapy. Five pts with stable disease achieved a minor response (lesion shrinkage ≥25% and <50%). Three pts remain progression-free for ≥12 cycles (12+, 17+, and 32+ cycles, respectively). Pts enrolled Pts on-study for ≥1 cycle Pts with FFP for ≥2 cycles Pts with FFP for ≥4 cycles Pts with FFP for ≥12 cycles 55 42 12 9 3 In conclusion, several pts with multiple relapsed DLBCL achieved prolonged periods of stable disease following enzastaurin treatment, although the objective tumor response rate was low. In addition, enzastaurin was well tolerated. These results suggest that enzastaurin, an oral agent, has clinical activity in DLBCL that warrants further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".