MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PACIFIC trial: A randomized phase II study of apatorsen and abiraterone in patients (Pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have had PSA progression while receiving abiraterone (ABI).

2017· article· en· W2597648644 on OpenAlexaff
Kim N., Mark T. Fleming, Katherine Sunderland, Costantine Albany, Joel Gingerich, Fred Saad, Scott North, Alexander Starodub, Richard C. Lauer, Joseph D. Ruether, Madelaine Miranda Sgroi, Mark C. Scholz, Christopher J. Sweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalCancerCare ManitobaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerClinical endpointInternal medicineAdverse effectAbiraterone acetateAndrogen deprivation therapyOncologyUrologyProgression-free survivalCancerPhases of clinical researchRandomized controlled trialClinical trialGastroenterologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

146 Background: Heat Shock Protein 27 (Hsp27) is a multi-functional chaperone that regulates cell signaling and survival pathways implicated in cancer progression. In prostate cancer models, Hsp27 chaperones androgen receptor (AR) and enhances transactivation of AR-regulated genes. Apatorsen is a 2nd generation antisense that inhibits Hsp27 expression with clinical activity demonstrated in pts with mCRPC. Methods: mCRPC patients with PSA-only progression on ABI + prednisone (P) 10-20 mg daily were randomized to continuing ABI + P (Control Arm) or ABI + P with Apatorsen 600 mg IV x 3 loading doses then 800 mg IV weekly (Study Arm). Control Arm pts could cross over to receive apatorsen at time of progression. Primary endpoint was the proportion of pts progression free (PSA, clinical and radiologic) at day 60. Assuming a 25% increase in proportion of pts progression free and a null hypothesis of 5%, the planned sample size was 74 patients (type I error 20%, type II error 10%). Results: 72 pts were randomized: 36 to Control Arm, 36 to Study Arm. Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms: median age was 72 years (53-89); ECOG PS 0/1 in 44/56% of pts; median PSA of 29.4 (2.5-470.0); metastases to bone/lymph nodes/liver or lung occurred in 63/27/10%; elevated LDH and alkaline phosphatase in 26% and 26% ; 47% had ≥ 5 CTC/7.5 mL. Adverse events (AEs) were mainly grade 1-2 infusion reactions. 18 pts had grade 3/4 adverse events considered apatorsen related including: dyspnea (14%), fatigue (14%), increased ALT (9%), increased AST (9%), and thrombocytopenia (9%). Primary and secondary outcomes are summarized in the Table. Conclusions: Apatorsen may have activity when added to abiraterone for mCRPC patients progressing on abiraterone. Establishing predictors of response should be a priority for future studies. Clinical trial information: NCT01681433. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207