Adult Sibling and Sibling-In-Law Relationships in South Korea: Continuity and Change of Confucian Family Norms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of adult sibling and sibling-in-law relationships in South Korea. Given that Confucian and egalitarian norms have coexisted and often collided in families in contemporary Korea, this study sets out to examine how Confucian norms with regards to age and gender have remained the same or changed in the context of Korean adult sibling and sibling-in-law relationships. In-depth interviews were conducted with 17 middle-aged Koreans (nine men and eight women) who were married and had at least one sibling and one sibling-in-law. A thematic analysis revealed that brothers and their wives experienced relational difficulties because of conflicts in Confucian versus egalitarian expectations on the eldest couple’s roles or due to the unmet roles on their normative expectations. Thanks to the contemporary versions of Confucian gender norms, sisters reported that they had close relationships and frequent interactions without concerns about instrumental responsibilities within their families-of-origin. Brother-sister relationships typically remained distant after marriage because of Confucian gender norms that differentiated brothers as insiders and married sisters as outsiders from their families-of-origin. These findings suggest that the co-existence of Confucian and egalitarian family norms plays an important role in shaping the dynamics of adult sibling and sibling-in-law relationships in contemporary Korea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".