A phase I dose-escalation study of TKM-080301, a RNAi therapeutic directed against polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), in patients with advanced solid tumors: Expansion cohort evaluation of biopsy samples for evidence of pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS2621 Background: TKM-080301 is a lipid nanoparticle formulation of a small interfering RNA (siRNA) directed against PLK1, a serine/threonine kinase that regulates multiple critical aspects of cell cycle progression and mitosis. Anti-tumor activity, RNA interference and pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition have been conclusively demonstrated in preclinical models. Demonstration of pharmacodynamic effects of PLK1 inhibition in patient biopsy samples is an exploratory objective of this first-in-human study. Methods: TKME080301 is being evaluated in an open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 patients receive TKME080301 as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment can continue until disease progression, based on overall clinical benefit. Tumor response is determined according to RECIST criteria. Primary study objectives include determination of safety, maximum tolerated dose and dose limiting toxicities. Secondary objectives include characterization of pharmacokinetics and the preliminary assessment of anti-tumor activity. Five cohorts have been enrolled and a tentative Phase 2 dose has been identified. An expansion cohort of 10 patients began enrolling in February, 2013. The focus of the expansion cohort will be to collect additional safety and pharmacokinetic data at the tentative Phase 2 dose, as well as pharmacodynamic data from mandatory biopsy samples. Pre- and post-dose biopsy samples will be evaluated for potential evidence of PLK1 inhibition using 5’ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) polymerase chain reaction (to identify the predicted PLK1 mRNA cleavage product), histology (to assess for the presence of aberrant mitotic figures) and immunohistochemistry. An update on enrollment and pharmacodynamic evaluations will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01262235.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".