MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Development of an Optimized rAAV2/6 Human Factor 8 cDNA Vector Cassette for Hemophilia a Gene Therapy

2016· article· en· W2601651086 on OpenAlexaff
Brigit E. Riley, Jeff Boonsripisal, Alicia Goodwin, Dominique Cartier, Eudean Garces, Kate Nesbitt, Courtney Dwyer, Stephen J. Ballaron, Kassandra Hebert, Hung Tran, Andrea Kang, Lei Zhang, Kathleen Meyer, Judith S. Greengard, Christine Hough, Richard Surosky, Dale Ando, David Lillicrap, Geoff Nichol, Michael C. Holmes

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenetic enhancementFactor IXMedicineVector (molecular biology)Clotting factorTransgeneImmunologyRecombinant DNABiologyInternal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hemophilia A, which is caused by a mutation in the Factor 8 (F8) gene resulting in a deficiency or lack of the Factor VIII (FVIII) protein, is the most common inherited bleeding disorder in humans with an estimated worldwide incidence of half a million people. The disorder is X-linked and occurs in approximately 1 in 5,000 males; however there is also a growing appreciation of the impact on carrier females having a single mutant allele, with at least 10% of hemophilia A female carriers having less than normal clotting activity. Even modest increases in Factor V III activity (>1% of normal) can have a positive impact on patient lives, thus making the disease an ideal candidate for liver-directed gene therapy. Recombinant AAV (rAAV) has been used extensively for nearly 20 years as a gene therapy vector in preclinical and clinical studies where rAAV delivery to non-dividing tissues such as liver, brain and muscle affords stable, long-term transgene expression. However, there has been a lag in the clinical translation of a rAAV gene therapy approach for Hemophilia A/human F8 (hF8) compared to Hemophilia B/human Factor 9 due to poor yields of rAAV encoding a F8 transgene at clinical scale, and a requirement for large doses of rAAV F8 vector to achieve therapeutically relevant levels of circulating human FVIII (hFVIII), with the attendant risk of inducing an AAV-directed immune response requiring transient immunosuppression. To address these issues we optimized a rAAV F8 cDNA vector cassette to improve both virus yields and liver-specific hFVIII expression. The rAAV F8 cDNA vector cassette optimization required multi-factorial modifications to the liver-specific promoter module, hF8 transgene, synthetic polyadenylation signal and vector backbone sequence. This iterative process resulted in improved vector yields at research scale and greater than five-fold improvement in vector yields at clinical scale using our proven manufacturing process. Administration of the optimized rAAV hF8 cDNA packaged in serotype AAV2/6 at a dose of ~7.2E+12 vg/kg to both wild type and Hemophilia A mice resulted in robust circulating hFVIII levels and activity (levels in wild type mice were 241.6% of normal, and activity in Hemophilia A mice were 330.9% of normal). An analysis of hF8 mRNA levels in different tissues following dosage with our optimized vector demonstrated that hF8 expression from the modified promoter module was restricted to the liver. Notably there was a striking impact on hemostasis in the Hemophilia A mice treated with the optimized rAAV hF8 cDNA, with a reduction in bleeding time from 38.3 minutes to 2.5 minutes in treated mice (n = 12, p-value < 0.0001), which is in line with bleeding times in wild type mice. Initial studies in non-human primates (NHPs) resulted in supraphysiological levels of circulating hFVIII with mean peak values of 400-600% of normal levels. A follow up dose-ranging study was performed in NHPs with a rAAV2/6 F8 cDNA vector manufactured using our GMP clinical manufacturing process. Administration of vector doses ranging from 6E+11 vg/kg to 6E+12 vg/kg resulted in therapeutic circulating levels of hFVIII that were 5% - 229% of normal levels. The peak circulating hFVIII levels achieved in this dose-ranging study using GMP clinical-scale vector exceeds the levels previously reported in NHPs by several fold on an AAV vector dose basis. The high potency of this enhanced rAAV F8 cDNA cassette could significantly reduce the dose required to achieve therapeutically relevant levels in human subjects and reduce the potential of developing immune responses to AAV capsid requiring immunosuppression. Disclosures Riley: Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Boonsripisal:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Goodwin:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Garces:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Ballaron:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Tran:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Kang:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Zhang:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Meyer:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Greengard:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Surosky:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Ando:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Lillicrap:bayer: Research Funding; biogen: Research Funding; CSL: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; Sangamo Biosciences Inc: Research Funding. Nichol:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment. Holmes:Sangamo BioSciences Inc: Employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→