MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase II study of mocetinostat, an oral isotype-selective histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, in combination with 5-azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

2013· article· en· W2602728909 on OpenAlexaff
Selina M. Luger, Casey L. O’Connell, Virginia M. Klimek, Maureen Cooper, Emmanuel C. Besa, James M. Rossetti, Gregory K. Reid, Rachel Humphrey, Robert E. Martell, Guillermo Garcia‐Manero

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Canadian institutionsPyrogenesis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAzacitidineDecitabineMyelodysplastic syndromesLenalidomideInternal medicinePharmacodynamicsCytarabineGastroenterologyPhases of clinical researchOncologyBone marrowPharmacokineticsLeukemiaMultiple myelomaClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7116 Background: Mocetinostat (MGCD0103) is an orally available, isotype-selective, non-hydroxamate HDAC inhibitor targeting HDACs 1,2, 3 and 11 with single agent activity in AML and both Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Preclinical evaluation demonstrating in vitro and in vivo synergy and antileukemic activity with demethylating agents, including 5-azacitidine (AZA), prompted clinical evaluation of mocetinostat + AZA in MDS and AML. Methods: This open-label, Phase II trial enrolled patients with MDS or AML. Patients received AZA (75 mg/m2SC; days 1-7 every 28 days) and mocetinostat (90-110 mg 3x/wk starting on AZA day 5). Anticancer activity, safety and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were evaluated. We report here on the MDS cohort. Results: Twenty patients with MDS were enrolled. Eight patients had received prior therapy for MDS including decitabine (n=1), lenalidomide (n=3), tipifarnib (n=2) and cytarabine (n=2). Median age was 70.5 yrs (range 41-81). Disease control rate (defined as CR + marrow-CR + PR + SD) was 80% (16/20). Ten patients (50%) had baseline marrow blast counts ≥10% (protocol-defined high risk). Responses in high-risk patients included 5 (50%) with CR + marrow-CR and 2 (20%) with SD. Six patients (30%) had an on-treatment marrow blast count of 0. These included 3 patients in the high-risk category, with baseline blast counts of 11%-15%. CR was observed in one patient, a 74-yr-old male with previously untreated RAEB. In this patient, marrow blasts fell from a baseline of 11% to 0% following 1 cycle of treatment; CR with normalization of all cell lines was achieved by late Cycle 3. He remained on study for 1 yr. Most drug-related AEs in the study were grade 1 or 2. The most common drug-related grade 3/4 events were nausea (15%), vomiting, fatigue, anemia, thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia (10% each). There was one death (5%), due to pneumonia that was not felt by the investigator to be drug related. Conclusions: The combination of mocetinostat and 5-azacitidine in patients with MDS demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and encouraging evidence of clinical benefit. Further clinical studies are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT00324220.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchFrench-language works237,207