MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PR16: Normal and neoplastic tissues with partial Hus1 impairment show hypersensitivity to cisplatin in vivo

2017· article· en· W2604639310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Terese E. Noe, Cleo Siderides, Aitor Gallastegui, James M. Cheung, Tina Abratte, Kelly R. Hume

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCisplatinDNA damageIn vivoCancer researchOncogeneDNA repairG2-M DNA damage checkpointBiologyCancerDNACell cycleChemotherapyCell cycle checkpointGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The DNA damage response (DDR) factor HUS1 is vital for proper functioning of the ATR checkpoint pathway. Following DNA damage, HUS1 forms a heterotrimeric complex with RAD9 and RAD1 and works with other checkpoint and scaffold proteins to activate ATR and CHK1 kinases. HUS1 also has separate functions that promote DNA repair. Due to its essential nature and diverse roles in genome maintenance, we hypothesized that HUS1 would be critical in the response of normal and neoplastic tissues to the DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic, cisplatin. Cisplatin is a widely used chemotherapeutic that damages DNA via platinated adducts, which form intrastrand and interstrand crosslinks. To test our hypothesis, we made use of a mouse model whereby a hypomorphic Hus1 allele is combined with a null allele in order to achieve partial impairment (Hus1neo/Δ1n) in vivo. Hus1+ and Hus1neo/Δ1n FVB mice were administered high dose cisplatin intraperitoneally (13.5 mg/kg). Body weights were recorded daily and mice were euthanized when humane intervention criteria were met. Hus1neo/Δ1n mice had reduced 7-day survival (P = .0071) and increased weight loss (P = .0485) when compared to Hus1+ mice. In order to determine if neoplastic tissues had a similar requirement for HUS1 in response to DNA damage inflicted by cisplatin, we combined Hus1 impairment with K-ras oncogene activation in vivo. K-RAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Mutations in this oncogene, the majority of which occur in codon 12, affect 25–30% of western NSCLC patients. K-RAS encodes for a membrane-bound GTPase that regulates cell growth, differentiation, and survival. In our model, activation of oncogenic K-ras is restricted to the lung and is achieved via a tetracycline-controlled reverse transactivator linked to the CCSP promoter. In the presence of doxycycline, mutant Kras4bG12D is expressed in type II alveolar epithelial cells, and lung tumors develop in a regulatable, predictable manner. Mice with wild-type or partial Hus1 impairment and simultaneous oncogenic K-ras activation were screened for lung tumor development via computed tomography (micro-CT), then treated with maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) cisplatin, and assessed for response according to semiautomated volumetric methods and the clinical standard, RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Using either histologic evaluation or micro-CT imaging, mice with partial Hus1 impairment have a decreased tumor burden at 1- and 3- weeks after cisplatin treatment, as compared to mice with wild type Hus1. Overall, this data identifies a role for HUS1 in the response of normal and neoplastic tissues to the DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic, cisplatin. Understanding tissue specific responses to cisplatin is important for determining how therapeutics targeting the DDR will work cooperatively with traditional cytotoxic agents in the treatment of cancer. This abstract is also being presented as Poster B08. Citation Format: Terese E. Noe, Cleo C. Siderides, Aitor Gallastegui, James M. Cheung, Tina Abratte, Kelly R. Hume. Normal and neoplastic tissues with partial Hus1 impairment show hypersensitivity to cisplatin in vivo [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr PR16.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer ResearchSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207